2020
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1834403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in mortality associated with cancer drug approvals in the United States from 2000 to 2016

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our descriptive analyses build on recent work in broader populations of lung cancer and NSCLC patients [ 4 , 9 ], demonstrating population level improvements in survival of subgroups of patients with admNSCLC over time which align well with the timing of the introduction of targeted and immunotherapies. However, by utilizing patient level EHR data on treatment and outcomes, we have been able to go further than previous studies, demonstrating that the changes in treatment patterns may plausibly explain the observed improvements in survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our descriptive analyses build on recent work in broader populations of lung cancer and NSCLC patients [ 4 , 9 ], demonstrating population level improvements in survival of subgroups of patients with admNSCLC over time which align well with the timing of the introduction of targeted and immunotherapies. However, by utilizing patient level EHR data on treatment and outcomes, we have been able to go further than previous studies, demonstrating that the changes in treatment patterns may plausibly explain the observed improvements in survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The National Institute of Cancer has identified an annual decrease in cancer mortality between −0.7% and −2% in France attributable to earlier diagnosis and significant therapeutic advances. 19 At 31 December 2021 landmark, ITs enabled 16 173 (range: 13 804-17 141) deaths to be avoided, corresponding to 12.2% of additional patients surviving compared to the previous standard of care at this date. The number of initiating patients in our study corresponded to 4.2% of incident cancer patients in France, but deaths avoided represents 10% of annual deaths meaning ITs have had a large positive impact on cancer mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies demonstrated that innovative cancer drug approvals were associated with a reduction from 10% to 30% in cancer mortality between 1990 and 2011. 17 , 18 , 19 These studies are few, were interested in different countries with heterogeneous HTA processes and are not specific to a given class of drugs. Thus, while ITs are now largely available in France and in >20 cancer indications, little is known about their benefit at a population level, in reducing mortality and increasing life-years (LYs) gained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to United States data, the five-year survival of colorectal cancer is 65%. Between 2000 and 2016, there was a 34% reduction in colorectal cancer-related mortality with cancer drug approvals 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%