1994
DOI: 10.1139/z94-253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in masked thresholds of a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) associated with angular separation of signal and noise sources

Abstract: The masked pure tone thresholds of a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) were measured at various angles using a white noise masker. The white noise source was placed at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° relative to the midline of the seal's head (0°). The masked pure tone thresholds for each angle were determined at 2, 4, 8, and 16 kHz. As the angle separating the signal and noise sources increased from 0° to 90°, the critical ratios of the harbour seal decreased by 1–4 dB. This shift in masked thresholds from a reference poin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we assume that marine mammals have the ability to spatially segregate signals and noise (e.g. Turnbull 1994, Holt & Schusterman 2007. We therefore include a representative term for signal directionality in our model of communication masking for free-ranging animals, but we do not give it an empirically informed value.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we assume that marine mammals have the ability to spatially segregate signals and noise (e.g. Turnbull 1994, Holt & Schusterman 2007. We therefore include a representative term for signal directionality in our model of communication masking for free-ranging animals, but we do not give it an empirically informed value.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only exception was the 25.6 kHz masker, which was generated and filtered using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and transmitted from the computer through a Roland Quad-Capture USB 2.0 Audio Interface (sampling rate 192 kHz; Roland Corporation US, Los Angeles, CA, USA) and a Reson VP1000 voltage preamplifier (in air only) before reaching the amplifier. Test signals and masking noise were projected from the same speaker to avoid spatial release from masking (Terhune and Turnbull, 1989;Turnbull, 1994;Holt and Schusterman, 2007). For in-air CR determination, the speakers used were the same as for the in-air audiogram.…”
Section: Stimulus Generation and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychophysical procedures were similar to those used in Experiment I, with the addition of masking noise on each trial. Masking noise was projected from the same underwater transducer as the signal to prevent spatial release from masking (Turnbull, 1994). The onset of the masking noise coincided with the onset of the light indicating the start of a trial; the noise offset occurred after the end of the 4-s trial interval.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%