2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Markers of Ovarian Reserve After Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent studies, AMH serum levels seemed to be the most popular marker for ovarian reserve testing after laparoscopic cystectomy; however, most of the studies focused on short‐term observations. Drops in AMH serum concentration were observed 1 and 3 months after laparoscopic cystectomy and reported in the literature . In a systematic review of 11 publications, Somigliana et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In recent studies, AMH serum levels seemed to be the most popular marker for ovarian reserve testing after laparoscopic cystectomy; however, most of the studies focused on short‐term observations. Drops in AMH serum concentration were observed 1 and 3 months after laparoscopic cystectomy and reported in the literature . In a systematic review of 11 publications, Somigliana et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ergun et al [19] reported in his study that the serum AMH levels were found to decrease following the laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy and this finding could be accepted as an indicator of diminished ovarian reserve. The statistically-significant decrease in postoperative AMH levels were observed in laparoscopic cystectomy operations performed due to either ovarian endometrioma or ovarian cysts other than endometrioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A pilot randomized controlled trial in 2013 suggested that AMH levels were not signi cantly different at the baseline in the 4-6 postoperative weeks, in the 3rd postoperative month among women with salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy versus no salpingectomy [58]. The previous studies showed that serum AMH level is a statistically signi cant decline after ovarian nonendometriotic cystectomy [42,43,45,47]. It was reported that ovarian reserve evaluated with AMH was reduced in patients with ovarian endometriomas when compared with those with other benign ovarian cysts, and with those with healthy ovaries [59].The current study indicated that the ovarian reserve decreased after the surgery, and that in comparison with E2, FSH levels and OARI and AFC, the serum AMH levels could be a convenient and reliable marker for testing ovarian reserve in the short-term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An undetectable AMH level suggests diminished ovarian reserve and may allow a treatment to be tailored to each individual [17,41]. The recent studies have shown that serum AMH level has been accepted as the most reliable and easily measurable marker for post-operative assessment of ovarian reserve, for it can show a postoperative decline [5,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%