2019
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Lower-Limb Biomechanics, Soft Tissue Vibrations, and Muscle Activation During Unanticipated Bipedal Landings

Abstract: We aimed to explore the biomechanical differences between the anticipated drop jump and unanticipated drop landing. Twelve male collegiate basketball players completed an anticipated drop jump and unanticipated drop landing with double legs from a height of 30 cm. Kinematics, impact force, soft tissue vibrations, and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes of the dominant leg were collected simultaneously. The anticipated drop jump showed more flexed lower limbs during landing and increased range of motion compared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…124,125 The use of spontaneous cuing creates an unanticipated landing task, which has been previously associated with increased injury-risk biomechanics compared to anticipated landing. 126 (2) Jump squats may be modified by placing four cones around the participant at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degree positions (Figure 1F). After numbering each cone one through four, the clinician may then rapidly call out cues to the athlete to specify which cone they should face after each jump squat.…”
Section: Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…124,125 The use of spontaneous cuing creates an unanticipated landing task, which has been previously associated with increased injury-risk biomechanics compared to anticipated landing. 126 (2) Jump squats may be modified by placing four cones around the participant at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degree positions (Figure 1F). After numbering each cone one through four, the clinician may then rapidly call out cues to the athlete to specify which cone they should face after each jump squat.…”
Section: Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak soft tissue acceleration ( a peak ), dominant frequency ( f v ), and the damping coefficient ( c ) were used as the main parameters characterizing the vibration ( Figure 3 ) [ 5 , 23 ]. The latter two parameters were determined by the equation below: where s is the measured signal, a is the vibration amplitude, c is the damping coefficient, f v is the dominant frequency (damped), and φ is the phase coefficient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak soft tissue acceleration (a peak ), dominant frequency (f v ), and the damping coefficient (c) were used as the main parameters characterizing the vibration (Figure 3) [5,23]. The latter two parameters were determined by the equation below:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D motion capture system (Vicon T40, Oxford Metrics, Oxford, UK) was used to collect lower-extremity sagittal plane kinematics with 16 infrared cameras at a sampling rate of 240 Hz. In total, 23 retroreflective makers were used to define the foot, leg, and thigh segments [28,29]. The sagittal plane angles of the hip, knee, and ankle joints are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Data Collection 241 Sagittal Kinematics Datamentioning
confidence: 99%