2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00822.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in light and nitrogen availability under pioneer trees may indirectly facilitate tree invasions of grasslands

Abstract: Summary The first trees establishing in grasslands may indirectly favour their seedlings in competition with neighbouring herbaceous vegetation by increasing soil fertility with nitrogen‐rich litter and by reducing light levels under their canopies. It is predicted that increasing soil nitrogen availability will accelerate invasion of trees by stimulating their growth more than that of herbaceous species. Decreasing light availability is predicted to increase tree invasion by limiting the growth of herbaceou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
139
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, tallow tree had a lower growth rate than natives in the two locations where it has been present for a longer period of time (figure 1a). There are many possible explanations for this pattern, such as differences in soil types (Barrilleaux & Grace 2000), moisture (Burns & Miller 2004;Butterfield et al 2004) or environmental conditions (Rogers & Siemann 2002;Siemann & Rogers 2003c) among sites, but results of herbivory bioassays indicated that pest accumulation likely plays a role in this reversal of tallow tree and native performances in at least the Georgia site. Since seedling survival and growth can determine plant population dynamics (Crawley 1996), these results for seedlings may indicate tallow tree invasion pressure in these locations as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, tallow tree had a lower growth rate than natives in the two locations where it has been present for a longer period of time (figure 1a). There are many possible explanations for this pattern, such as differences in soil types (Barrilleaux & Grace 2000), moisture (Burns & Miller 2004;Butterfield et al 2004) or environmental conditions (Rogers & Siemann 2002;Siemann & Rogers 2003c) among sites, but results of herbivory bioassays indicated that pest accumulation likely plays a role in this reversal of tallow tree and native performances in at least the Georgia site. Since seedling survival and growth can determine plant population dynamics (Crawley 1996), these results for seedlings may indicate tallow tree invasion pressure in these locations as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbance can be broadly defined to include alterations in resources (Pickett and others 1989), such as changes in the availability of limiting nutrients that subsequently alter plant community structure and composition (Fourqurean and others 1995;Siemann and Rogers 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…being a poorer competitor for light, water or others resources (e.g. Siemann and Rogers, 2003). We calculate the competitive dominance and, respectively, the relative size d i of a PPS by normalising its biomass per m 2 of occupied area BM i with the sum of biomass of all n PPSs:…”
Section: Invasion and Extinction Resulting From Resource Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is to a first approximation reasonable, since differences in competitive ability result mainly on differences in size. For instance, the acquisition of light depends on size (Bengtsson et al, 1994) such that, for example smaller plants are over-shaded by larger ones (Siemann and Rogers, 2003). But smaller sized plants could also have higher competitive abilities than bigger ones (Keating and Aarssen, 2009).…”
Section: Representation Of Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%