2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in inertial parameters of the lower limb during the impact phase of dynamic tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept of variability is emerging in the scientific literature. For example, during the impact after a jump, localization of segments COM changes up to 17% due to the soft tissue displacement [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This concept of variability is emerging in the scientific literature. For example, during the impact after a jump, localization of segments COM changes up to 17% due to the soft tissue displacement [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trunk is composed more than other parts of the body, like moving organs. We know that the inertial properties of the lower limb change during an impact, with 17% of leg mass shifts toward the upper part of the limb [ 31 ]. We can hypothesize a larger change in the trunk due to internal organ displacements during impact, although no experimental data exists on this point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum permissible wobbling mass displacement within shank, thigh and trunk segments during this approach have been 5.0 cm, 7.5 cm and 11.0 cm, respectively [13,36,60]. These numbers may be excessive, however, with recent experimental research recording shank and thigh soft tissue displacement during drop landings of up to 1.4 cm relative to the underlying bone [70]. Furthermore, the frequently cited source for trunk wobbling mass displacement limits is a study on viscera displacement during hopping [71].…”
Section: Anatomical Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This has increased the ability of forward-dynamics simulation models to recreate experimental ground reaction forces and responses to impacts [63,64], albeit not entirely [60]. Although this method enables soft tissue displacement, future advancements may facilitate more realistic displacement magnitudes and damping periods [60,70,71]. Additionally, the inclusion of compliance within joint structures [61,62] may facilitate more accurate predictions of ground reaction forces, internal forces, and elastic wave transmission in sporting movements with great impact forces [60,142].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, there are significant differences, making comparability between different studies difficult (Durkin and Dowling 2003). However, is emerging the concept in scientific literature, that inertial parameters of body segments are not stable, and that there are changes in the localization of segments CG up to 17% due to the soft tissue movement, for example during impact (Furlong et al 2020). These studies attract today newest interest due to the development of additive manufacturing in the industry (e.g.…”
Section: Development Of Body Measurement Techniques and Methods For Biomechanical Purposesmentioning
confidence: 99%