2021
DOI: 10.1111/add.15620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in illicit drug use and markets with the COVID‐19 pandemic and associated restrictions: findings from the Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System, 2016–20

Abstract: Aims To describe (i) self‐reported changes in drug use and (ii) trends in price, perceived availability, and perceived purity of illicit drugs, among people who regularly use ecstasy/ 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and other illicit stimulants in Australia following COVID‐19 and associated restrictions. Design Annual interviews with cross‐sectional sentinel samples conducted face‐to‐face in 2016–19 and via video conferencing or telephone in 2020. Data were col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…suggest that supply shortages during the pandemic resulted in temporary increases in the cost of cannabis, cocaine, and some other products on the illicit drug market in Europe [ 9 ]. In an Australian study, market indicators (use of specific drugs, perceived availability and purity) remained relatively stable for most drugs, although there was some evidence of perceived reduction in the availability and purity of cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA [ 47 ]. Authors suggested that reduction in the use of MDMA and other stimulants was mainly associated with the impediments to socialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…suggest that supply shortages during the pandemic resulted in temporary increases in the cost of cannabis, cocaine, and some other products on the illicit drug market in Europe [ 9 ]. In an Australian study, market indicators (use of specific drugs, perceived availability and purity) remained relatively stable for most drugs, although there was some evidence of perceived reduction in the availability and purity of cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA [ 47 ]. Authors suggested that reduction in the use of MDMA and other stimulants was mainly associated with the impediments to socialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic may have disturbed drug trafficking and shifted national drug consumption trends, because of shortage of drugs, like cocaine and heroin, may have facilitated the increased consumption of locally produced or more accessible and cheaper substances, like N 2 O and cannabis. For example, the use of ecstasy, a typical party drug, decreased during the lockdown [15]. However, a report from the Netherland noted a decrease in ecstasy and N 2 O use during the COVID-19 lockdown because of a lack of social opportunities [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most epidemiological studies report a decline in the use of stimulants during the initial phase of the pandemic, mostly resulting from the implementation of confinement and physical distancing measures ( Ali et al, 2021 ; EMCDDA, 2020b , 2020c ; EMCDDA & EUROPOL, 2020 ; Gili et al, 2021 ; Manthey et al, 2021 ; Palamar, Le, & Acosta, 2021 ; Price et al, 2021 ), with later lifting of restrictions associated with a recovery to previous levels ( European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2021a ) According to the EMCDDA, the use of cocaine and MDMA seems to be the most affected by COVID-19 restrictions. However, most of the information available is compiled from online surveys with known individuals who use drugs, making it difficult to generalize the results of this subsample to the general population which contains also occasional users ( Ali et al, 2021 ; Manthey et al, 2021 ; Palamar, Le, & Acosta, 2021 ; Price et al, 2021 ). The adverse social effects of the COVID-19 measures, such as social isolation and anxiety, could potentially be a driver for first time drug usage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%