2009
DOI: 10.1086/648072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes inTrypanosoma cruzi–Specific Immune Responses after Treatment: Surrogate Markers of Treatment Efficacy

Abstract: Background As many as 20 million people are living with Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Latin American, yet few receive any treatment. The major limitation in developing and evaluating potential new drugs for their efficacy is the lack of reliable tests to assess parasite burden and elimination. Methods Adults volunteers with chronic T. cruzi infection were evaluated clinically and stratified according to the Kuschnir classification. Individuals in group 0 and group 1 clinical status were treated with 5 mg be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
104
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
11
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, inconsistent detection of T. cruzi-specific T cells [41,42] limits the translation of such assays of immunological biomarkers into use for assessing treatment outcomes in humans. Other surrogate immunological markers have shown promise in assessing treatment outcomes [43] and are likely to be more widely employed because definitive evidence of parasitological cure is impractical because of the insensitivity of even the best assays. If we are to reliably assess in humans the effectiveness of new drugs and improved treatment protocols that appear promising in mice, then we are going to need to put much more effort into developing definitive tests of cure in humans and not just clearance of detectable parasites from blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, inconsistent detection of T. cruzi-specific T cells [41,42] limits the translation of such assays of immunological biomarkers into use for assessing treatment outcomes in humans. Other surrogate immunological markers have shown promise in assessing treatment outcomes [43] and are likely to be more widely employed because definitive evidence of parasitological cure is impractical because of the insensitivity of even the best assays. If we are to reliably assess in humans the effectiveness of new drugs and improved treatment protocols that appear promising in mice, then we are going to need to put much more effort into developing definitive tests of cure in humans and not just clearance of detectable parasites from blood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, autoimmune humoral factors are, possibly, a consequence rather than a cause of the heart disease (73,91,229,332). A conclusive answer to the question of the origin of autoimmune chagasic myocardiopathy is not within reach by any canonical explanation (126,223).…”
Section: Autoimmunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, ongoing efforts for the identification of additional biomarkers are underway, including electrocardiographic, immunologic and biochemical markers, which may greatly improve and facilitate the monitoring of Chagas disease progression and thus vaccine evaluation. [86][87][88][89][90][91][92] As indicated above, a successful vaccine will need to induce a strong cellular immune response, with the activation of CD8 + cytotoxic T cells in order to effectively control T. cruzi parasites. This requirement places some constraints on the formulations and types of vaccines that may be used, since such a response is harder to induce than a humoral response.…”
Section: ©2 0 1 1 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%