1980
DOI: 10.3386/w0262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Household Living Arrangements 1950-76

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data indicate that the number of parents (of any age) living in the household of a child has declined from roughly 2.8 million persons in 1950 to about 1.7 million in 1980, despite the rapid increase in the elderly population, particularly those over age 80, during this period. This trend also reveals itself in the tremendous, nearly sevenfold, increase in the number of unrelated individuals who are living alone, and corroborates the evidence given by Michael, Fuchs, and Scott (1978). A final piece of evidence which speaks to the desirability of this trend is the finding of Morgan et ale (1962) Despite the rapid growth in the number of households in Table A.1 which these simultaneous developments have encouraged, Table 2 Table 2.· Another reason, to which we turn, is the form of the transfer.…”
Section: Appendixsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These data indicate that the number of parents (of any age) living in the household of a child has declined from roughly 2.8 million persons in 1950 to about 1.7 million in 1980, despite the rapid increase in the elderly population, particularly those over age 80, during this period. This trend also reveals itself in the tremendous, nearly sevenfold, increase in the number of unrelated individuals who are living alone, and corroborates the evidence given by Michael, Fuchs, and Scott (1978). A final piece of evidence which speaks to the desirability of this trend is the finding of Morgan et ale (1962) Despite the rapid growth in the number of households in Table A.1 which these simultaneous developments have encouraged, Table 2 Table 2.· Another reason, to which we turn, is the form of the transfer.…”
Section: Appendixsupporting
confidence: 70%