2014
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Geographic Variation in the Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease After Publication of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial

Abstract: Background-Clinical uncertainty is cited as a cause of geographic variation. However, little is known about the effect of comparative effectiveness research on variation. We examined whether geographic variation in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) declined after publication of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Methods and Results-We examined changes in utilization and geographic variation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,20,21 PCI use has increased significantly in China 12 but varies by region, partly because of inconsistent medical development. 22 Identifying the determinants of IHM and PCI use among AMI patients is likely to be important in developing targeted interventions to improve access to PCI and to reduce AMI mortality. 23 Previous studies, however, used data from a specific region or selected hospitals [24][25][26][27][28] or focused on patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,20,21 PCI use has increased significantly in China 12 but varies by region, partly because of inconsistent medical development. 22 Identifying the determinants of IHM and PCI use among AMI patients is likely to be important in developing targeted interventions to improve access to PCI and to reduce AMI mortality. 23 Previous studies, however, used data from a specific region or selected hospitals [24][25][26][27][28] or focused on patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The recognition that PCI has not been shown to reduce cardiovascular events, together with the introduction of appropriateness criteria in patients with stable ischemic heart disease, has been associated with a 25% decline in the rate of PCI use for such patients in the United States between 2006 and 2010. 2729 However, in 2010 there were still 500 000 PCI procedures performed in the United States, of which perhaps half were for stable disease. 29 …”
Section: Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only few studies have further examined the regional and hospital variations in the percentage of PCIs for nonacute indications [5, 9, 10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohan et al suggested that among hospital referral regions, the variations in the rate of PCIs performed for SIHD declined by 28% after the publication of the COURAGE study, but geographic variations remained higher for SIHD than for acute coronary syndrome [5]. Two studies have revealed that although the overall proportion of nonacute PCIs classified as inappropriate has declined, the hospital-level variations in inappropriate PCIs persist [9, 10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%