2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in gastric mucosal microbiota in gastric carcinogenesis: a systematic review protocol

Abstract: IntroductionThe human stomach is a complex and diverse microbial ecosystem. Consecutive alternations of gastric microbiota occur in gastric carcinogenesis, while the changing pattern during this process remains controversial across studies. We aim to identify the changes in the diversity and composition of gastric mucosal microbiota in gastric tumorigenesis.Methods and analysisWe will search through PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, as well as conference proceedings and references of review articles for o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will apply funnel plot and Egger’s test to assess publication bias 59. If funnel plots present asymmetry, we will use Egger’s test to statistically examination 63 64…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will apply funnel plot and Egger’s test to assess publication bias 59. If funnel plots present asymmetry, we will use Egger’s test to statistically examination 63 64…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed the systematic review based on a peer-reviewed and published protocol ( 14 ) with the registration number CRD42020206973 and complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement ( 15 ). Reporting items were detailed in the PRISMA checklist ( Supplementary Material ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in both groups. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were described in the published study protocol ( 14 ). Study selection was conducted by two researchers (YYY and RYJ) independently, with disagreements resolved through discussion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation