2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) as an indicator of SOX9 transcription factor activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vector expressing SOX9-mGFP was constructed by cloning mGFP (PS100040, Origene) with the C-terminal of wild type SOX9 (RC208944, Origene) using SgfI and MluI restriction sites. The correct reading frame of the fusion construct was verified by sequencing and its functionality was confirmed by mutation studies [13].…”
Section: Vector-plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vector expressing SOX9-mGFP was constructed by cloning mGFP (PS100040, Origene) with the C-terminal of wild type SOX9 (RC208944, Origene) using SgfI and MluI restriction sites. The correct reading frame of the fusion construct was verified by sequencing and its functionality was confirmed by mutation studies [13].…”
Section: Vector-plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We have previously shown that the average TF-FRAP rates correlate to DNA binding (ChIP assay) and transcriptional activity (gene expression analysis) [13]. However, these bulk measurements did not give sufficient information about SOX9 transcriptional activity in a time-resolved manner at the subpopulation level in a heterogenic cell population in, for example, MSCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence recovery after photo bleaching (FRAP) utilizes time-lapse imaging and a fluorescently tagged molecule to determine mobility of proteins within a given system. This approach has been widely used to study protein dynamics in the context of living cells ( van Royen et al., 2009 ) as multiple studies have found a strong link between transcription factor mobility and transcription factor function ( Govindaraj et al., 2019 ; Stenoien et al., 2001a ). Previous FRAP on ERα ( Amita et al., 2010 ; Damdimopoulos et al., 2008 ) demonstrated a rapidly moving receptor within the nucleus under control conditions (no ligand added) and decreased mobility upon E2 or 4HT treatment, owing, in part, to the receptor binding to DNA, protein-protein interactions, and ill-defined nuclear structures (i.e., nucleoskeleton/nuclear matrix).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we assessed the distribution of GFP-Ubx populations revealing a larger immobile population of GFP-Ubx WT compared to GFP-Ubx N51A (Fig.7b). The immobile population thus refers to the Ubx WT molecule stably bound to enhancers and promoters (Govindaraj et al, 2019). Notably, the residual immobile population observed for the GFP-Ubx N51A could account for the protein clusters observed for both GFP-Ubx forms (Supplementary Fig.13c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%