Changes in Educational Methodologies in Predoctoral Dental Education: Finding the Perfect Intersection

Abstract

This article describes the evolution of thinking, primarily over the past ifteen years, within the academic dentistry community concerning teaching and learning strategies to facilitate students' acquisition of competence. Readers are encouraged to consider four issues. First, looking back to the time of the Institute of Medicine report Dental Education at the Crossroads: Challenges and Change ifteen years ago, in the mid-1990s, where did we think we would be now, in 2011, in regard to the structure of the predoctoral curriculum and use of speciic educational methodologies, and to what extent have those predictions come true? The author's own crystal ball predictions from the 1990s are used to kick off a discussion of what connected and what did not among numerous advocated educational reforms, many of them transformative in nature. Second, what is the nature of the evidence supporting our ongoing search for educational best practices, and why are advocacy for educational best practices and prediction of down-the-road outcomes so treacherous? This section distinguishes types of evidence that provide limited guidance for dental educators from evidence that is more helpful for designing educational strategies that might make a difference in student learning, focusing on factors that provide a "perfect intersection" of student, teacher, educational method, and learning environment. Third, readers are asked to revisit four not-so-new teaching/learning methods that are still worthy of consideration in dental education in light of best evidence, upcoming events, and technology that has inally matched its potential. Fourth, a speciic rate-limiting factor that hinders the best efforts of both teachers and students in virtually all U.S. dental schools is discussed, concluding with a plea to ind a better way so that the good works of dental educators and their students can be more evident.Mr.

Dental and Medical Students’ Use and Perceptions of Learning Resources in a Human Physiology Course

“…For instance, Hendricson argued that examining teaching/learning formats (laboratory exercises versus online modules, etc.) for potential “winners” is fruitless because any modality should achieve the desired outcomes if it incorporates certain fundamental components of adult learning and instructional design 25 …”

Teaching Silver Diamine Fluoride in U.S. Dental Schools’ Predoctoral Curricula

“…Acceptance of any new procedure or technology by dentists varies among those who are early adopters, late adopters, or non‐adopters 20 . Dental schools can also be grouped as early adopters, late adopters, and non‐adopters of innovations not required by CODA standards 21 . Little has been published in the dental literature concerning the reasons for the adoption, non‐adoption, or rejection of new technology in dentistry, but there are certainly some barriers to diffusion including economics, incompatibility with existing value systems, and complexity of the innovation 22 – 24…”

Creating an Efficient Learning Model: Students’ Perceptions and Outcomes of an Active Learning Fixed Prosthodontics Course

“…However, evidence suggests that a learning curve (plateau effect) exists, meaning that, at a certain point, repetition of procedures no longer contributes to competence 2 . Dental accreditation standards have stimulated change from requirements‐driven education to a competency‐based educational model 3 , 4 . In a competency‐based approach, schools must determine how much practice is needed in a preclinical setting before a student has mastered fundamental concepts.…”