2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802004000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in eating habits following total and frontolateral laryngectomy

Abstract: This study showed that difficulty in swallowing is not rare in total and frontolateral laryngectomy cases. Such patients, even those who did not complain of dysphagia, also had minor difficulties while eating, and had to make some adaptations to their meals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the studies was rated level A. Thirty-two studies were rated level B and 12 studies level C, according to Siwek et al 10 Level B studies comprised one low-quality randomized controlled trial, 13 ten prospective cohorts, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] ten retrospective cohorts, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] two case-control studies, 34,35 and nine crosssectional studies. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] All case series were classified as level C evidence. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] None of the 44 articles met all critical appraisal criteria (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…None of the studies was rated level A. Thirty-two studies were rated level B and 12 studies level C, according to Siwek et al 10 Level B studies comprised one low-quality randomized controlled trial, 13 ten prospective cohorts, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] ten retrospective cohorts, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] two case-control studies, 34,35 and nine crosssectional studies. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] All case series were classified as level C evidence. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] None of the 44 articles met all critical appraisal criteria (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen articles fulfilled all criteria for external validity, 13,17,22,[26][27][28]30,32,35,36,[38][39][40]44,46,49,50 and six studies did not fulfill any of these criteria. 14,19,33,34,42,45 Two of the included articles fulfilled all criteria for internal validity, 18,48 representing a low risk of bias. Fourteen articles met only 2-3 criteria for internal validity, 14,16,19,27,30,33,36,40,[51][52][53][54][55][56] indicating a high risk of bias.…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations