2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01469-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the cortical excitability of the M1 was not measured in this study, thus we cannot confirm whether acb-tDCS could induce changes in corticospinal tract excitability. However, as Takano et al have previously demonstrated that acb-tDCS elicits a decrease in corticospinal excitability after 13 min of stimulation [50], we could infer that our protocol (20 min of acb-tDCS) was sufficient to induce changes in corticospinal excitability. Third, our experiment did not include behavioral measurements, hindering us from investigating whether the changes in HbO on the M1 cortices are related to behavioral outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Second, the cortical excitability of the M1 was not measured in this study, thus we cannot confirm whether acb-tDCS could induce changes in corticospinal tract excitability. However, as Takano et al have previously demonstrated that acb-tDCS elicits a decrease in corticospinal excitability after 13 min of stimulation [50], we could infer that our protocol (20 min of acb-tDCS) was sufficient to induce changes in corticospinal excitability. Third, our experiment did not include behavioral measurements, hindering us from investigating whether the changes in HbO on the M1 cortices are related to behavioral outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Then, the study task structure prevented a control experiment to isolate the cerebellar-specific role in internal model formation using the same paradigm. On the one hand, delivering ctDCS only during familiarization would lead to carry-over effects ( Takano et al ., 2022 ), challenging the differentiation between online and offline effects. On the other hand, extending the time between phases could impact memory maintenance of action-cue associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational modelling studies have suggested that weak exogenous electric currents at an intensity of 2 mA can penetrate the outer layers of the cerebellar cortex. Experimental research findings have demonstrated that cerebellar tDCS can elicit neurophysiological alterations in cerebellar-brain interactions [86] and has the potential to impact gait adaptation, motor learning, and cognition in healthy individuals [106][107][108][109]. For instance, cerebellar tDCS has been found to interfere with motor cortex synaptic plasticity during PAS involving the median nerve and motor cortex, suggesting the cerebellum's role in synchronizing sensory input and motor output [110].…”
Section: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%