2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in cortical thickness across the lifespan in major depressive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cortical surface area and thickness are also genetically and phenotypically independent (18), but the contribution of cortical thickness toward structural brain abnormalities in mood disorders remains largely unknown. A small number of studies have, however, reported cortical thickness abnormalities in MDD and BD patients in the frontal lobe (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and superior temporal gyrus (22,23,29,31). Moreover, thickness reductions in the inferior and middle temporal (31), parahippocampal (22), and fusiform gyrus (21,23) have been found in BD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical surface area and thickness are also genetically and phenotypically independent (18), but the contribution of cortical thickness toward structural brain abnormalities in mood disorders remains largely unknown. A small number of studies have, however, reported cortical thickness abnormalities in MDD and BD patients in the frontal lobe (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and superior temporal gyrus (22,23,29,31). Moreover, thickness reductions in the inferior and middle temporal (31), parahippocampal (22), and fusiform gyrus (21,23) have been found in BD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handful of studies have assessed spatial patterns of cortical thickness in MDD. Interestingly, the regional patterns of cortical thinning in MDD do not perfectly reflect what would be expected from the neuroimaging literature (i.e., cortical thinning is not confined to cognitive and emotive centers; fronto-cortico-limbic structures) [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Exploratory rmANOVAs (group as between-and hemisphere as withinsubject factors, HAMD 17 as the covariate) yielded no significant results, apart from a weak trend for a main effect of group (F [1,28] Finally, Chi-square tests revealed no significant difference in the proportion of the pediatric versus adult MDD onset individuals in either the abuse or nonabuse groups. MANCOVAs (HAMD 17 scores and age as covariates) were carried out with the two MDD onset (adult and pediatric) and two childhood trauma groups (abuse and nonabuse) as the independent variables on cortical thickness measures.…”
Section: Two Group Analyses (Mdd Groups: Childhood Abuse Group and Nomentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations