2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00736-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in corrected carotid flow time induced by recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Curiously, FTc also increased more following fluid administration in the non-responsive group, which is inconsistent with the findings of Kimura A et al [ 20 ] and Xu L et al [ 24 ]. The reasons for this discrepancy may be the following: 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Curiously, FTc also increased more following fluid administration in the non-responsive group, which is inconsistent with the findings of Kimura A et al [ 20 ] and Xu L et al [ 24 ]. The reasons for this discrepancy may be the following: 1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…These included invasive monitoring, MAP and noninvasive ultrasound monitoring [18]. Among them, it was more common to use the change in stroke volume (SV) or stroke volume index (SVI) after fluid therapy as a measure of volume responsiveness [19,20]. However, we used SVV as the grouping criterion because SVV is currently considered the most reliable indicator of volume responsiveness and its most common diagnostic threshold is 13%, though SVV is reliable only under strictly controlled conditions (e.g., tidal volume ≥ 8 m l/kg ideal body weight and an absence of arrhythmias) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in recent times there has been considerable interest in using carotid ultrasound for predicting fluid responsiveness [7, 10-15, 17,18, 20-22]. These papers studied carotid corrected flow time [7, 10,14,15,17,18,22] changes in peak velocity [11-13, 17, 18, 20, 21] or carotid blood flow [22] to predict fluid responsiveness. Since most of the available studies used carotid corrected flow time or changes in peak velocity, we decided to use those two parameters for our systematic review and meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All rights reserved. Studies using carotid corrected flow time have used either Bazett's [10,18] or Wodey's [10,[14][15]17] formulas for assessing FTc. Bazett's formula is calculated by dividing the flow time with square root of cycle time while Wodey's formula gives FTc as measured flow time + [1.25 (heart rate -60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation