1996
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1996.41.5.0939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in climate and hydrochemical responses in a high‐elevation catchment in the Rocky Mountains, USA

Abstract: A continuous climate record since 195 1 at Niwot Ridge in the Colorado Front Range shows a decline in mean annual temperature, an increase in annual precipitation amount, and a decrease in mean daily solar radiation for the summer months. The increase in precipitation amount explains about half of the 200% increase in annual wet deposition of NO,-to Niwot Ridge over the last decade. Differences in climate parameters between 1994 and 1995 (increased snow depth and decreased net energy flux to the snowpack) resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
116
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
116
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Explanations refer to the fact that high-elevation stations are more directly in contact with the free troposphere and to the importance of snow-albedo positive feedback (common at high elevations). In contrast, other analyses of surface observations report an increase in surface lapse rates, especially on a local basis (Williams et al, 1996;Garnett et al, 1997;Pepin, 2000). For example, analyses in Colorado (Losleben, 1983Greenland, 1987Greenland, , 1989Brown et al, 1992;Pepin, 2000) have illustrated contrasting temperature trends at differing elevations in the Front Range, USA, with increased surface lapse Mountain Climate Program).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Explanations refer to the fact that high-elevation stations are more directly in contact with the free troposphere and to the importance of snow-albedo positive feedback (common at high elevations). In contrast, other analyses of surface observations report an increase in surface lapse rates, especially on a local basis (Williams et al, 1996;Garnett et al, 1997;Pepin, 2000). For example, analyses in Colorado (Losleben, 1983Greenland, 1987Greenland, , 1989Brown et al, 1992;Pepin, 2000) have illustrated contrasting temperature trends at differing elevations in the Front Range, USA, with increased surface lapse Mountain Climate Program).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our results fit alongside the global warming theory of Barry (1990), in which increases in precipitation and cloudiness, and hence cooling in high elevation regions, result from steeper lapse rates at the surface. In Barry's hypothesis, taken up by Williams et al (1996), increased atmospheric instability is thought to enhance convective processes, perhaps selectively over mountainous regions. However, the weaker free-air lapse rates we also observe imply enhanced stability and reduced convection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decreasing northeastern Colorado summer temperatures have been reported in the past [Greenland et al, 1995;Stohlgren et al, 1998]. Also decreased solar radiation was reported at some high-elevation sites [Williams et al, 1996]. Recent studies of plant successional trends and watershed discharge in the northeastern Colorado mountains also indicated a middle to high elevation cooling over the last 50-100 years [Stohlgren et al, 1998].…”
Section: Comparative Temperature Trendsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the Northern Hemisphere, strong negative trends in the extent of snow cover have been observed over recent decades (Déry and Brown 2007). Increased snowfall and snow depth have been reported at the highest-elevation sites of the western United States (Williams et al 1996); however, most locations in the Mountain West have experienced snowpack declines, and concern has risen about streamflow, water yields, and water supply. In the Pacific Northwest, extensive snow-covered regions are now deemed at risk in terms of their capacity to provide reliable water yields because of atmospheric warming, altitudinal shifts in the distribution of snow and rain, and declining winter snowpacks (Nolin and Daly 2006).…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%