2017
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1416410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Choroidal Thickness after Cataract Surgery

Abstract: Mean SFCT increased after cataract surgery. The changes in SFCT return to near the baseline after 3 months.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
9
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
9
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, significant decrease of TNEP and ML in CC (Additional file 1: Table S5) could result from increased demand in heat dissipation through opening of anastomoses corroborating with published studies [2,16,26]. Some authors hypothesized increase in subfoveal thickness to be a consequence of local choroidal inflammatory response but found no reasoning for these changes, while correlation to CDE was not reported [18,25,27].…”
Section: Choroidsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, significant decrease of TNEP and ML in CC (Additional file 1: Table S5) could result from increased demand in heat dissipation through opening of anastomoses corroborating with published studies [2,16,26]. Some authors hypothesized increase in subfoveal thickness to be a consequence of local choroidal inflammatory response but found no reasoning for these changes, while correlation to CDE was not reported [18,25,27].…”
Section: Choroidsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, none of these studies actually measured the local release of inflammatory metabolites. On the contrary, the prevailing view modelled from our study results' was that increase in macular hemodynamics could not be the result of postoperative inflammation as the changes persisted three months after the surgery, when inflammatory response should have been over [2,15,[17][18][19], nor decrease in IOP due to OPP consistency (Additional file 1: Table S2) [3]. Moreover, all patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with favorable, low PHACO time and CDE (Additional file 1: Table S1), while factors contributing to neural damage and blood-brain barrier breakdown were excluded prior to enrolment.…”
Section: Functional Hyperaemiacontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Other authors have analyzed postoperative CT changes in eyes without retinal pathology and found a significant increase in CT. Some authors have declared a prolonged significant increase in subfoveal CT (SFCT) after phacoemulsification [20,29,30]. Similar to our results, Abdellatif and coworkers have published that SFCT increased statistically significantly after 1 month (p = 0.014) with no significant change 3 months after the surgery (p = 0.073) [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further, signi cant decrease of TNEP and ML in CC (Additional le 1: Table S5) could result from increased demand in heat dissipation through opening of anastomoses corroborating with published studies [2,16,26]. Some authors hypothesized increase in subfoveal thickness to be a consequence of local choroidal in ammatory response but found no reasoning for these changes, while correlation to CDE was not reported [18,25,27].…”
Section: Choroidsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, none of these studies actually measured the local release of in ammatory metabolites. On the contrary, the prevailing view modelled from our study results' was that increase in macular hemodynamics could not be the result of postoperative in ammation as the changes persisted three months after the surgery, when in ammatory response should have been over [2,15,[17][18][19], nor decrease in IOP due to OPP consistency (Additional le 1: Table S2) [3]. Moreover, all patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsi cation with favorable, low PHACO time and CDE (Additional le 1: Table S1), while factors contributing to neural damage and blood-brain barrier breakdown were excluded prior to enrolment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%