2003
DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200312150-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in CD4+ T-Cell Differentiation Phenotype During Structured Treatment Interruption in Patients With Chronic HIV-1 Infection

Abstract: Markers of maturation and activation were measured on peripheral CD4+ T cells in chronically HIV-1-infected patients in a randomized, controlled pilot study of structured treatment interruption (STI). Eight subjects underwent 2 cycles of 1 month off and 1 month on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), followed by a final 3-month interruption. During STI, CD4+ T-cell percentage remained relatively stable in 4 of 8 subjects. The remaining 4 STI subjects had significant rapid decline in CD4+ T-cell percen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A). This profile of CD4 ϩ cell subpopulation distribution did not differ from those previously reported for a healthy donor population (respectively, 28, 58, 12, and 2%) (31). We found that Cy-G-CSF treatment induced a slight but significant ( p Ͻ 0.05) decrease in naive CD4 ϩ cells relative rate (from 28 to 19%), whereas the percentages of the three subpopulations of memory CD4 ϩ cell (central memory, effector memory, and late effector) were not significantly affected ( Fig.…”
Section: Mobilization Of Naive Central Memory Effector Memory and supporting
confidence: 62%
“…2A). This profile of CD4 ϩ cell subpopulation distribution did not differ from those previously reported for a healthy donor population (respectively, 28, 58, 12, and 2%) (31). We found that Cy-G-CSF treatment induced a slight but significant ( p Ͻ 0.05) decrease in naive CD4 ϩ cells relative rate (from 28 to 19%), whereas the percentages of the three subpopulations of memory CD4 ϩ cell (central memory, effector memory, and late effector) were not significantly affected ( Fig.…”
Section: Mobilization Of Naive Central Memory Effector Memory and supporting
confidence: 62%
“…This rapid decline and rebound are consistent with previous observations on CD4 T-cell redistribution (13,14) and the conclusion that very short therapy interruptions in subjects with preserved CD4 counts do not have the ongoing detrimental immunologic impact seen with longer treatment interruptions. The safety of brief STI is supported by several other studies (26)(27)(28) showing that brief STIs do not affect overall CD4 T-cell count and importantly, do not diminish immune function as determined by antigen recall responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…ϩ lymphocytes, such expression patterns have been previously described for eight healthy controls in the United States (1). In that study, 28% Ϯ 2% (mean Ϯ standard error of the mean) of CD4 ϩ T cells were T naïve (CD45RA ϩ CCR7 ϩ ), 59% Ϯ 2% were T CM (CD45RA Ϫ CCR7 ϩ ), 11% Ϯ 1% were T EM (CD45RA Ϫ CCR7 Ϫ ), and 2% Ϯ 1% were T EMRA (CD45RA ϩ CCR7 Ϫ ).…”
Section: Cd56mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Ϫ CD4 ϩ T cells-a population which is very small in healthy individuals and has not been well characterized (1,11). Data on the frequencies and absolute numbers of these T-cell subpopulations are not available for populations in subSaharan Africa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%