1961
DOI: 10.1037/h0043171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in cardiac response of the albino rat as a function of electroconvulsive seizures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

1962
1962
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heart rate was recorded from two stainless-steel wires inserted in the animals back just above the front legs and above the rear legs (Stern & Word, 1961). A GME electroencephalograph was used to record heart rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heart rate was recorded from two stainless-steel wires inserted in the animals back just above the front legs and above the rear legs (Stern & Word, 1961). A GME electroencephalograph was used to record heart rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paucity of information is especially surprising when one considers the number of investigations involving the recording of cardiac activity in rats (e.g. ]\IcCleary, 1954; Stern & Word, 1961). Similarly, despite the known existence of sweat glands on the volar surface of the rat's paws (Ring & Randall, 1947), few studies have dealt with GSR in the rat (see Wagner, 1950).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light onset, by comparison, evoked only slight effect in heart-rate reactivity. Previous work (Black, 1964;Stern & Word, 1961) reported decreases in heart rate to the initial presentation of acoustic stimuli in rats whereas light stimuli have been found to be less effective in rats (Bloch-Rojas, Toro, & Pinto-Hamuy, 1964) and dogs (Petelina, 1958) in influencing heart-rate responses. However, it is possible, as Graham and Clifton (1966) suggest, that the critical difference may not be auditory vs. nonauditory stimulation, but whether stimulus rise times in this case were faster with auditory than nonauditory stimuli.…”
Section: Effects Of Stimulus Modalitymentioning
confidence: 95%