1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00628-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in brain somatostatin in memory-deficient rats: comparison with cholinergic markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, intracerebroventricular application of somatostatin facilitated memory and comprised a mitigating effect upon experimentally induced retrograde amnesia (Vecsei et al 1983(Vecsei et al , 1984Lamirault et al 2001). Also, depletion of somatostatin through application of cysteamine (Szabo and Reichlin 1981) impaired hippocampus-dependent memory performance in a variety of tasks including passive and active avoidance learning (Bakhit and Swerdlow 1986;Haroutunian et al 1987;Schettini et al 1988;DeNoble et al 1989;Vecsei and Widerlov 1990;Matsuoka et al 1994), as well as water and radial maze paradigms (Fitzgerald and Dokla 1989;Matsuoka et al 1995;Guillou et al 1998). However, some studies indicate opposite effects of intrahippocampal injections of cysteamine on hippocampusdependent tasks (Guillou et al 1998(Guillou et al , 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, intracerebroventricular application of somatostatin facilitated memory and comprised a mitigating effect upon experimentally induced retrograde amnesia (Vecsei et al 1983(Vecsei et al , 1984Lamirault et al 2001). Also, depletion of somatostatin through application of cysteamine (Szabo and Reichlin 1981) impaired hippocampus-dependent memory performance in a variety of tasks including passive and active avoidance learning (Bakhit and Swerdlow 1986;Haroutunian et al 1987;Schettini et al 1988;DeNoble et al 1989;Vecsei and Widerlov 1990;Matsuoka et al 1994), as well as water and radial maze paradigms (Fitzgerald and Dokla 1989;Matsuoka et al 1995;Guillou et al 1998). However, some studies indicate opposite effects of intrahippocampal injections of cysteamine on hippocampusdependent tasks (Guillou et al 1998(Guillou et al , 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we propose that inhibition of IRAP in the central nervous system extends the half-life of endogenous neuropeptides that potentiate memory. For example, vasopressin, substance P, and somatostatin, known substrates for IRAP (18), play important roles in cognitive function (26,27). It is tempting to speculate that their functions may be enhanced by inhibition of IRAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is ample evidence for the importance of acetylcholine in hippocampal-dependent mnemonic tasks (Blokland, 1996), the possible role of SRIF in mnemonic functions has also been demonstrated. Cysteamine has been shown to impair hippocampal-sensitive spatial learning when administered systemically (Matsuoka et al, 1995) or infused directly into the hippocampus (Guillou et al, 1998). Experiments using intrahippocampal injections of SS or cysteamine have provided evidence that both facilitatory and impairing effects can be observed, depending on the task used (Lamirault et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, intrahippocampal injections of SS-14 have been shown to enhance the rate of acquisition of a spatial discrimination task in the eightarm radial maze (Guillou et al, 1998). In contrast, both intrahippocampal and systemic injections of cysteamine, a depleter of SS-14 stores, was found to slow down the rate of acquisition in the radial-arm maze (Sessions et al, 1989;Guillou et al, 1998) and water maze (Fitzgerald and Dokla, 1989;Matsuoka et al, 1995) spatial tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%