1978
DOI: 10.1159/000172643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Body Weight, Kidney Weight and Proximal Tubule Length during Pregnancy in the Rat

Abstract: Pregnant rats became significantly heavier than non-pregnant controls 2 days after conception. Just prior to term, they exhibited a gross 52% increase over their non-pregnant body weight. Dry kidney weight had increased by 13% in 7-day-pregnant animals, which also showed a 20% increase in proximal renal tubule lengths. At term, the former was not maintained as compared with controls; whereas the latter is maintained throughout pregnancy, and may, at least partially, account for the enhanced renal reabsorption … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
34
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(28 reference statements)
13
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the proximal convoluted tubule was greater towards the end of pregnancy than in virgins as previously described (Garland, Green & Moriarty, 1978). There was no significant difference between the length of the proximal convoluted tubules in lactating and pregnant animals in spite of the increased weight of the kidney (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The length of the proximal convoluted tubule was greater towards the end of pregnancy than in virgins as previously described (Garland, Green & Moriarty, 1978). There was no significant difference between the length of the proximal convoluted tubules in lactating and pregnant animals in spite of the increased weight of the kidney (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Reabasorption rates were not significantly different at the different stages of pregnancy (see Table 2). Taken together with the altered lengths of the proximal tubules in pregnancy (Garland et al 1978) this would imply (if reabsorption is constant along the nephron) that in pregnancy more fluid was reabsorbed by the proximal tubule because of its greater length and not because of any alteration of intrinsic reabsorptive capacity.…”
Section: Urine Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the uncertainty attached to total collections of proximal tubular fluid (see above) it has not been possible to obtain direct information on proximal tubular reabsorption in the free flow condition. Data from the stationary microperfusion experiments indicate that there may be no change in intrinsic reabsorptive capacity, but since there is an increase in proximal tubular length during pregnancy (Garland et al 1978) the total reabsorption in the proximal tubule may well be raised in pregnancy. What is certain is that if there are changes in proximal fluid reabsorption these may be offset by altered reabsorption in the loop of Henle, since fractional reabsorption is the same at all stages of pregnancy by the early distal tubule and there are only small changes in absolute fluid reabsorption.…”
Section: Fluid Reabsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, changes in fractional reabsorption of sodium and water that have been described for the whole kidney in pregnancy (e.g. Atherton & Pirie, 1977;Bishop & Green, 1980) are unlikely to be due to increased fractional reabsorption per unit proximal tubular length; but may be related to the increased length of the proximal tubule found in pregnancy (Garland et al 1978) or to changes in segments of nephron beyond the proximal tubule.…”
Section: Sodium and Fluidmentioning
confidence: 96%