“…Rather, we should perhaps aim for clarification of the contribution of each mechanism in individual Brugada syndrome patients, so as to render rational and effective therapy, tailored to each of these mechanisms, a realistic aim in the near future. Table 1 Clinical and experimental evidence to suggest the electrophysiological mechanism of Brugada syndrome Support for repolarization disorder hypothesis Sodium channel blockers exacerbate/provoke ST elevations [27] Linkage with SCN5A mutations exhibiting reduced sodium current [3] Quinidine normalizes ECG and prevents arrhythmias [80,81,116] More prevalent phenotype in males [5,20,105] ST elevations are usually facilitated by slow heart rates [23,50] ST elevations are accompanied by epicardial action potential abbreviation [88] ''Spike-and-dome'' configuration of epicardial monophasic AP during heart surgery [90] ST elevation is associated with reduced ejection time of RV but not of LV [91] Support for depolarization disorder hypothesis Sodium channel blockers exacerbate/provoke ST elevations [27] Linkage with SCN5A mutations exhibiting reduced sodium current [3] ECG signs of general conduction slowing: axis deviation, PQ/QRS prolongation, sinus/AV node dysfunction [1,9,34,40,42 -45] High prevalence of late potentials [50,92,94,112,125] Late potentials indicate increased risk of arrhythmic events [94,125] Flecainide induces greater QRS widening in Brugada s. patients than controls [29] Conduction delay in right ventricular outflow tract (body surface mapping) [24,127] Longer HV interval predicts VT/VF inducibility [126] ST elevation correlates with delay in right ventricle contraction [91] Arrhythmogenic area is confined to small RVOT region (initiating PVCs, VT/VF inducibility, efficacy of catheter ablation) [58,132] Structural derangements, including fibrosis, in histological stud...…”