2017
DOI: 10.1177/1090198117714825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Body Mass Index During a 3-Year Elementary School–Based Obesity Prevention Program for American Indian and White Rural Students

Abstract: An elementary school-based health program that addresses a range of students' obesity-related health behaviors, the school health environment, and that involves educators and parents is an effective intervention for reducing or stabilizing BMI in rural White and American Indian students. School health programs for students living in rural communities may be especially effective due to greater school and community cohesiveness, and valuing of the school's primary role in improving community health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority (n=13) of studies evaluating healthy food provision were undertaken in primary/elementary schools. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Most of these were multicomponent interventions combining healthy food provision within school curriculum or other nutrition education activities. Ten studies measured anthropometric outcomes among Indigenous students, with most finding no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) postintervention, 23 25 however, one RCT reported a 10% reduction in the prevalence of overweight among Indigenous children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority (n=13) of studies evaluating healthy food provision were undertaken in primary/elementary schools. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Most of these were multicomponent interventions combining healthy food provision within school curriculum or other nutrition education activities. Ten studies measured anthropometric outcomes among Indigenous students, with most finding no significant difference in body mass index (BMI) postintervention, 23 25 however, one RCT reported a 10% reduction in the prevalence of overweight among Indigenous children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 Two studies undertaken in general school populations with mixed ethnicities reported favourable effects on obesity prevalence, including Indigenous children. 32 37 Studies evaluating dietary outcomes for Indigenous children frequently reported reductions in consumption of high fat/high sugar foods and beverages, 26–29 and/or improvements in food group and nutrient intake. 24 39 40 A low-quality evaluation of a fruit provision programme for Indigenous children (n=12) observed improvements in vitamin C status and hearing tests following the intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT), deft index (for primary/baby teeth) Stamm et al [ 43 ] 1980 Observational Canada n.a. 13–14 Decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT), Oral Hygiene Index (simplified) OHI(S) Tyler [ 44 ] 2004 Observational USA School based health centre 7–12 Body Mass Index (BMI), BMI percentiles for age and sex Vogeltanz-Holm & Holm [ 45 ] 2018 Interventional USA Schools Mean age 8.75 Body Mass Index (BMI), BMI percentiles for age and sex, BMI z-scores for age and sex Whittemore et al [ 46 ] 2013 Interventional USA Schools 14–17 Body Mass Index (BMI), BMI percentiles for age and sex Wrobel & Mielnik-Blaszczak [ 47 ] 2012 Interventional Poland Schools 12–13 Decayed, missing and filled surfaces (DMFS) a If there were no data on country but regions or continents, this information was noted in this column b If there was no information on population age but on mean age or school grade, this information was noted in this column c n.a. indicates that the information was not applicable d n.r.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified seven indices that we attributed as anthropometrical: body mass index (BMI) [ 13 , 14 , 16 20 , 22 , 24 26 , 29 , 30 , 34 – 36 , 38 , 40 , 44 46 ], BMI percentiles [ 13 , 14 , 17 , 20 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 44 46 ], BMI z-scores [ 24 , 35 , 45 ], waist-to-height ratio [ 19 ], waist-to-hip ratio [ 20 ], mid-arm muscle circumference [ 13 ] and ponderal index [ 27 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immense number of potential interactions and limitations of commonly used analytic approaches often results in obesity studies that only consider fragments of the ecological model [ 12 , 13 , 14 ]. As noted above, manually selecting less than a handful of interactions is ignoring hundreds or even thousands of other potentially meaningful interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%