1965
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1965.20.6.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in blood plasma during progressive dehydration

Abstract: Progressive dehydration of resting male subjects was accomplished by exposure to 43.3 C dry bulb, 29 C wet bulb for 12 hr. For control experiments, evaporative weight loss was replaced with 0.1% saline. For dehydrating subjects, the following relationships with evaporative weight losses were obtained: %Delta osmotic pressure = 1.14 (% evap wt loss) — 0.43; %Delta [Na+] = 1.37 (% evap wt loss) — 0.45; %Delta [K+] — 2.19 (% evap wt loss) — 1.29; %Delta hematocrit = 1.4 (%Delta evap wt loss) — 2.65. Comparison of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, based on body weight or surface area, if a female loses water via sweat glands at the same rate as a male, her plasma osmolarity increases at a greater rate than that of the male, thus affecting her sweat rate (Senay, 1968). Indeed, in support of this position the plasma osmolarity of the four female subjects during dehydration increased approximately 1P5 % for each 1 % body weight loss (Table 2), while similarly exposed males exhibited a 1 1 % increase in plasma osmolarity for each 1 % body weight loss (Senay & Christensen, 1965).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, based on body weight or surface area, if a female loses water via sweat glands at the same rate as a male, her plasma osmolarity increases at a greater rate than that of the male, thus affecting her sweat rate (Senay, 1968). Indeed, in support of this position the plasma osmolarity of the four female subjects during dehydration increased approximately 1P5 % for each 1 % body weight loss (Table 2), while similarly exposed males exhibited a 1 1 % increase in plasma osmolarity for each 1 % body weight loss (Senay & Christensen, 1965).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Each subject behaved similarly in that the increase in To during post-ovulatory dehydration was much less than pre-ovulatory increments in To, Indeed, two subjects showed an ability to reduce their body temperatures even as weight loss was continuing. The intercepts of all the regression equations (b, (Adolph & Associates, 1947;Bass & Henschel, 1956;Senay & Christensen, 1965;Senay, 1972). The reason for this lack of plasma volume expansion in these female subjects is not directly revealed by the experimental results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Dehydration is defined as net loss of body water resulting from decreased water intake or increased water loss. Dehydration leads to elevated osmolality of plasma and other extracellular fluids (21).…”
Section: Role Of the Osmotically Regulated Transcription Factor Nfat5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Given these contrasting circumstances of circulatory commitment in Groups A and B plus previous results (Senay & Christensen, 1965 for resting men exposed to heat, the following paradox must be considered: when heat and exercise are combined as when Group B was subjected to 400 C (Fig. 2) (Fig.…”
Section: Experiments I First Tunnel Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%