2010
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/5/056011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth

Abstract: This study was undertaken to assess the contribution of protein adsorption and cell growth to increases in electrode impedance that occur immediately following implantation of cochlear implant electrodes and other neural stimulation devices. An in vitro model of the electrode-tissue interface was used. Radiolabelled albumin in phosphate buffered saline was added to planar gold electrodes and electrode impedance measured using a charge-balanced biphasic current pulse. The polarisation impedance component increa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(78 reference statements)
10
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, unspecific fibrous tissue formation around the electrode increases the transitory resistance and interferes with an optimal nerve-electrode interaction. 10,11 Therefore, inhibition of connective tissue growth and minimizing of the distance between neuronal cells and electrode are major goals in auditory implant related research. Surface properties influence the implant-tissue interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, unspecific fibrous tissue formation around the electrode increases the transitory resistance and interferes with an optimal nerve-electrode interaction. 10,11 Therefore, inhibition of connective tissue growth and minimizing of the distance between neuronal cells and electrode are major goals in auditory implant related research. Surface properties influence the implant-tissue interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, despite the growth of tissue around and at a distance from the electrode, the far-field effects measured with access resistance are less affected by electrical stimulation. Previous work with an in vitro model of this system also showed an increase in impedance with cell growth and a reduction with stimulation of cell-covered electrodes [Newbold et al, 2010[Newbold et al, , 2011. The assessment of living cells during stimulation indicated that electropermeabilization of the cell membranes may have occurred [Newbold et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This has been studied before both in vivo and in vitro, (14,15) but not at such a high temporal resolution for extended periods of time in a preclinical model. This could potentially lead to improved outcomes for patients as knowledge of temporal changes in the electrodetissue interface and associated safety limitations improves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%