2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes and geographic variation in rates of preterm birth and stillbirth during the prepandemic period and COVID-19 pandemic, according to health insurance claims in the United States, April–June 2019 and April–June 2020

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of non-US studies [29], some hospital and population-based studies in the United Kingdom (UK) [7,30] and Canada [31,32], one hospital-based study in Philadelphia [33], and a population-based study in California [34] spanning different time periods in 2020, found no changes in PTD rates at the onset of the pandemic. In contrast, several studies in different countries [35][36][37][38], one of which was among privately insured women [39], a population-based study in Tennessee [40], and another meta-analysis within this time period [41], also reported a decrease in overall PTD rates or in specific subgroups [42]. Furthermore, only a limited number of studies indicated an overall increase in PTD [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A meta-analysis of non-US studies [29], some hospital and population-based studies in the United Kingdom (UK) [7,30] and Canada [31,32], one hospital-based study in Philadelphia [33], and a population-based study in California [34] spanning different time periods in 2020, found no changes in PTD rates at the onset of the pandemic. In contrast, several studies in different countries [35][36][37][38], one of which was among privately insured women [39], a population-based study in Tennessee [40], and another meta-analysis within this time period [41], also reported a decrease in overall PTD rates or in specific subgroups [42]. Furthermore, only a limited number of studies indicated an overall increase in PTD [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given the numerous potential variables and retrospective nature of this study, it is difficult to determine whether the preterm birth rate was due to maternal stress, illness, or overall health; specific drug use; or other factors. However, when looking at literature, studies show a decrease in preterm birth rates during the pandemic [ 29 , 30 ]. In a study looking at association of preterm birth rate during the 2020 stay-at-home order in our state, they reported significantly lower rates compared to previous years [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple population-based studies from Europe, South Korea, and Israel have demonstrated a reduction in the preterm birth (PTB) rate during the height of the pandemic and lockdown restrictions [1][2][3][4][5][6]; however, several studies found no difference in PTBs during the pandemic, including studies from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Canada [7][8][9]. Studies from the United States have also examined the effects of the pandemic on birth outcomes, although the majority have taken place in either a single hospital or hospital system [10][11][12][13] and included only a portion of hospitals from across the country [14][15][16] or included only commercially insured births [16], thereby limiting their generalizability to understand changes at the population level. Of the four population-based studies in the United States, all found a significant reduction in the PTB rate [17][18][19][20]; however, only one of these studies further investigated whether changes in PTB rates differed across socioeconomic characteristics such as race/ethnicity or payment source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%