Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems

Abstract

Understanding how and why changes propagate during engineering design is critical because most products and systems emerge from predecessors and not through clean sheet design. This paper examines a large data set from industry including 41,500 change requests that were generated during the design of a complex sensor system spanning a period of 8 years. In particular, the networks of connected parent, child, and sibling changes are resolved over time and mapped to 46 subsystem areas of the sensor system. These change networks are then decomposed into one-, two-, and three-node motifs as the fundamental building blocks of change activity. A statistical analysis suggests that only about half (48.2%) of all proposed changes were actually implemented and that some motifs occur much more frequently than others. Furthermore, a set of indices is developed to help classify areas of the system as acceptors or reflectors of change and a normalized change propagation index shows the relative strength of each area on the absorber-multiplier spectrum between −1 and +1. Multipliers are good candidates for more focused change management. Another interesting finding is the quantitative confirmation of the “ripple” change pattern previously proposed. Unlike the earlier prediction, however, it was found that the peak of cyclical change activity occurred late in the program driven by rework discovered during systems integration and functional testing.

Managing design variety, process variety and engineering change: a case study of two capital good firms

“…Balakrishnan and Chakravarty 1996;Gil et al 2004Gil et al , 2006Hegde et al 1992;Loch and Terwiesch 1999;Williams et al 1995), change propagation (e.g. Clarkson et al 2001;Eckert et al 2004Eckert et al , 2006Giffin et al 2009;Sosa 2008) and engineering change process design (e.g. Balcerak and Dale 1992;Dale 1982;Jarratt et al 2005Jarratt et al , 2011.…”

Using Network Science to Support Design Research: From Counting to Connecting

“…Batallas and Yassine 2006;Parraguez et al 2015a); or to analyse the propagation of changes and errors in the design process (e.g. Braha and Bar-Yam 2007;Giffin et al 2009;Wynn et al 2014). While this recent body of research has advanced our theoretical understanding and analytical methods to analyse networks in a design context, it has also highlighted the need for a more cohesive, systematic, and reflective revision of the many network features that have been and can be analysed, as well as the methodological steps followed in their analysis and their consequences.…”

Suggestions on Communications Systems for Off- Shore Vessels

“…A few studies focus on cooperative work in the maritime domain; for example, one researcher has concluded that physical and information spaces are not designed well and should be imSuggestions on communications systems for offshore vessels Papers from the 18th annual Dilemmas International Research Conference 3 proved to reflect a richer understanding of work routines onboard ships (Pan 2016). In engineering design, the first issues for engineers is a system's functionalities (Giffin et al, 2009). Engineers concern themselves with realizing functionalities in systems but often dismiss work practices (Greenwood and Sommerville, 2013).…”