2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijiscm.2010.036913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change processes and its impact on individuals: perception of ERP users in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication of the finding addresses change management; the current study supports the study of Poti et al (2010), which indicated the significance of implementing change as well as guiding people through the change management process. The change management strategy, which uses an integrated framework of knowledge formulation, strategy implementation, and status evaluation, can be also used to overcome resistance to change during implementation (Aladwani, 2001).…”
Section: Key Themessupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The implication of the finding addresses change management; the current study supports the study of Poti et al (2010), which indicated the significance of implementing change as well as guiding people through the change management process. The change management strategy, which uses an integrated framework of knowledge formulation, strategy implementation, and status evaluation, can be also used to overcome resistance to change during implementation (Aladwani, 2001).…”
Section: Key Themessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Six key themes on strategies and four themes on mitigating actions were unpacked from interview responses based on high frequency counts. References were found in the literature for key strategies that include change management (Finney & Corbett, 2007;Hasibuan & Dantes, 2012;Jayaraman & Bhatti, 2008;Poti et al, 2010;Somers & Nelson, 2001), risk management (Jayaraman & Bhatti, 2008), hands-on training (Somers & Nelson, 2001), clear communications (Holland & Light, 1999;Nah et al, 2001;Jayaraman & Bhatti, 2008), and having the right people for support and guidance from experts (Parr & Shanks, 2000;Tsai et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third implication of the study is that, although theories other than complexity theory were not part of the study's theoretical framework, the study findings specifically considering the critical challenges of people's resistance to change, lack of business buy-in from stakeholders, and interface issues suggest that there may be implications to the theories of system and change management (Buckle Henning & Chen, 2012;Kotter, 2012;Lucas, 2005;Malek & Yazdanifard, 2012;Poti, Bhattacharyya, & Kamalanabhan, 2010;Tambovcevs & Merkuryev, 2009).…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research showed a great number of challenges that emerged from the participant responses (Appendix A); however, based on highest frequency counts, the 12 top challenges are explored and highlighted (Table 2). All the top 12 challenges showed elements of project complexity in the ERP implementation at the case organization (Crawford et al, 2005;Doom et al, 2010;Finney & Corbett, 2007;Kemp & Low, 2008;Momoh et al, 2010;Nah et al, 2001;Poti et al, 2010;Somers & Nelson, 2001;Themistocleus et al, 2001;Turner & Cochrane, 1993;Yen & Sheu, 2004). The research showed the relationship between complex categories and critical challenges (Figure 2, Table 2).…”
Section: Data Cleanse Xmentioning
confidence: 92%