2002
DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of Vanilloid Receptor 1 Following Neuromodulation in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 Our previous studies suggested that the greater density of descending serotonergic and noradrenergic projections, elicited by the neuroprotective effects of the cellular grafts transplanted into a contusion lesion site, ameliorates of the dyssynergia between the bladder and the urethral sphincter 2-4 by providing some descending control over spinal nuclei and greater descending control over sensory transmission in the DH. [9][10][11][12] The density of bladder afferent projections, that is, CGRP-positive fibers in the DH, is increased after severe SCI [13][14][15] and this has been implicated in detrusor overactivity that develops following SCI. [2][3][4] Bladder afferents in the lumbosacral spinal cord also project to the DH, SPN and dorsal commissure in the lumbosacral spinal cord, 16,17 which was induced by disruption of the descending projections.…”
Section: Normalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Our previous studies suggested that the greater density of descending serotonergic and noradrenergic projections, elicited by the neuroprotective effects of the cellular grafts transplanted into a contusion lesion site, ameliorates of the dyssynergia between the bladder and the urethral sphincter 2-4 by providing some descending control over spinal nuclei and greater descending control over sensory transmission in the DH. [9][10][11][12] The density of bladder afferent projections, that is, CGRP-positive fibers in the DH, is increased after severe SCI [13][14][15] and this has been implicated in detrusor overactivity that develops following SCI. [2][3][4] Bladder afferents in the lumbosacral spinal cord also project to the DH, SPN and dorsal commissure in the lumbosacral spinal cord, 16,17 which was induced by disruption of the descending projections.…”
Section: Normalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other receptors (ie serotonin 2A, vanilloid VR1) also increase in density by 1-3 days caudal to spinal cord transection. 53,54 Such trans criptional/translational increases in neurotransmitter receptors could explain the initial re-emergence of reflexes. Receptor plasticity over 1-3 days post-SCI may underlie re-emergence of cutaneous reflexes in cats and humans, 7,55 tibial H-reflexes by 24 h in rats and humans, 28,33,34,56 and anal reflexes in rats and humans.…”
Section: Phase 2: Initial Reflex Return (1-3 Days)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…138,139 Functional electrical stimulation is an alternative method for stimulating specific synapses and neuron pools, therefore influencing spinal cord plasticity and performance. [140][141][142] Additional interventions that might enhance synapse formation by spared descending inputs include medications to increase excitability of spinal neurons (eg 5-HTP, clonidine, TRH, and theophylline), 54,[143][144][145] stimulants of axon growth (eg inosine), 146 stimulants of NT synthesis (eg clenbuterol), 147,148 inhibitors of Nogo and related myelin glycoproteins that block longer-distance axon sprouting, 149 and agents that block the intracellular Rho pathway, which inhibits axon growth. 150 Adding these interventions in combination with exercise therapies might have a synergistic effect on activity-dependent synapse growth.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Spinal Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 In rodents, vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1) expression was upregulated in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord after spinal cord injury, and neuromodulation was also associated with reduced expression of VR1. 15 Using a chemical cystitis model of HCl and acetic acid, the same group reported that although sacral stimulation (S1) could reduce voiding frequency rates, there did not appear to be a difference in the number of c-fos-positive neurons in the L6 spinal cord. 16 However, because most patients undergoing implantation do not have spinal cord injury nor evidence of acute bladder inflammation, it is unclear whether the mechanisms described in these animal studies may be involved.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Action Of Neuromodulation For Voidingmentioning
confidence: 99%