2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-004-0315-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of Sign of the Corrector’s Determinant for Homogenization in Three-Dimensional Conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we give (see Theorem 4.2) an example of a microstructure for which R ε is positive isotropic a.e., while R * is a constant negative isotropic matrix. This surprising result is linked to the change of sign of the corrector's determinant derived in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we give (see Theorem 4.2) an example of a microstructure for which R ε is positive isotropic a.e., while R * is a constant negative isotropic matrix. This surprising result is linked to the change of sign of the corrector's determinant derived in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest case, the Hall coefficient A H is equal to the inverse of the charge density, i.e., A H ¼ ρ −1 . A few years ago, building upon earlier work [17][18][19], Marc Briane and Graeme W. Milton predicted theoretically that the sign of the isotropic Hall coefficient can be reversed in chainmail-like three-dimensional metamaterials [20]. Notably, art inspired science: Chainmail artist Dylon Whyte suggested to them the three-dimensional structure [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to a crude summary, the present paper studies the correctors to conductivity equations. In conjunction with the work [6], it shows, quite unexpectedly, that even in a simple linear conduction problem, in dimension greater than two, laminates and non laminates can be discriminated by a very simple property which will be stated later in the section. This property is always enjoyed by laminates but (as shown in [6]), not necessarily by non laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Let us briefly digress to comment on the fact that in dimension d ≥ 3 Milton and the authors [6] proved that there exists a (non laminate) periodic two-phase geometry such that the solution to the problem analogue to (1.7) but in dimension d greater or equal to three, satisfies the following properties. It is defined almost everywhere and…”
Section: Dimension D ≥mentioning
confidence: 99%