2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of rings and singularity categories

Abstract: We investigate the behavior of singularity categories and stable categories of Gorenstein projective modules along a morphism of rings. The natural context to approach the problem is via change of rings, that is, the classical adjoint triple between the module categories. In particular, we identify conditions on the change of rings to induce functors between the two singularity categories or the two stable categories of Gorenstein projective modules. Moreover, we study this problem at the level of 'big singula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is simple but gives some interesting results. For instance, Theorem 3.6 is a “bimodule version” of a result of Oppermann–Psaroudakis–Stai [19, Proposition 3.7.1], which recovers some known results from the literature on singular equivalences (see Example 3.8 and Proposition 3.9) and gives some examples of singular equivalences of Morita type with level (see Remark 4.5 and Example 4.6).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This approach is simple but gives some interesting results. For instance, Theorem 3.6 is a “bimodule version” of a result of Oppermann–Psaroudakis–Stai [19, Proposition 3.7.1], which recovers some known results from the literature on singular equivalences (see Example 3.8 and Proposition 3.9) and gives some examples of singular equivalences of Morita type with level (see Remark 4.5 and Example 4.6).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A closely related triangulated category to the above is the singularity category, which is the stable category of the Frobenius category consisting of finitely presented Gorenstein projective objects. The study of how the singularity category moves along ring homomorphisms has been studied in [OPS19], albeit from a different viewpoint.…”
Section: Transfer Of Gorenstein Flat-cotorsion Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will now recall the more recent notion of 0-cocompactness as introduced in [37], together with its dual. A bit of terminology is involved:…”
Section: (Co)compactness and 0-(co)compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [37], coveting a more potent dual of (t 1 ), we introduced the weaker notion of 0-cocompactness ad hoc, and showed that if X is a set of 0-cocompact objects, then ⊥ X, ( ⊥ X) ⊥ (t 2 ) is a (stable) t-structure in T. The point was that the definition was forgiving enough to apply to the homotopy categories studied in that paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%