2016
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000002714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change of Nutritional Status Assessed Using Subjective Global Assessment Is Associated With All-Cause Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Malnutrition is an important and prevalent problem affecting 16% to 70% of dialysis patients, depending on the study population and assessment procedure [1][2][3]. In dialysis patients, insufficient nutritional intake, compromised clinical well-being, comorbidity and dialysis related factors can lead to poor nutritional status [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malnutrition is an important and prevalent problem affecting 16% to 70% of dialysis patients, depending on the study population and assessment procedure [1][2][3]. In dialysis patients, insufficient nutritional intake, compromised clinical well-being, comorbidity and dialysis related factors can lead to poor nutritional status [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of patients whose nutritional status deteriorated from well-nourished to malnourished or remained as malnourished for 1 year after the start of dialysis treatment was higher in the PD group than the HD group [11]. The changes in nutritional status assessed by SGA during the first year were associated with mortality in incident ESRD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The trained investigators rated each item from 1 to 7 and decided the overall SGA score. Based on the overall SGA score, the patients were categorized into three groups: well nourished (normal) = SGA score of 6-7, mildly to moderately malnourished = SGA score of 3-5, or severely malnourished = SGA score of 1-2 [11]. HGS was measured in the hand without vascular access for HD patients and in the non-dominant hand for PD patients.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main variable was nutritional status, assessed with modified subjective global assessment (SGA) scores (12). Relatively, the altered subjective global assessment (SGA) marks, identified by medical history on seven main topics and also the clinical qualification for four other categories was the remarkably quantitative scoring system including seven elements with a total score ranging from 7 to 35 (7 -13: normal), (14 -23: mild to moderately malnourished) and (24 -35: severely malnourished).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%