Change management practices

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.Abstract During the last two decades the public sector has come under increasing pressure to improve performance and demonstrate greater transparency and accountability. This pressure has resulted in public sector organisations facing shifts in ways of operating. Various corporate change strategies have been adopted by different public sector agencies, many of these cloning managerial practices from the private sector. These changes in public sector organisations have enormous significance for regional economic and social development. While there is a growing body of knowledge dealing with the management of corporate change there are still significant gaps in understanding the process. While there is much written on public versus private corporate change, there is little distinguishing between change in different types of public sector organisations. This paper analyses change management processes and seeks to determine whether a hybrid model of "new public management" delivers more favourable outcomes than a model focused on cost reduction and private sector prejudice for the bottom line.

Room for space in agencification reforms: A tale of three Italian museums

“…As a reaction to survey‐based research in the field of agencification, a distinct stream of research has started addressing autonomy as a process rather than a property. This stream draws on the broader theoretical perspectives in the field of organizational studies (Asquer, 2012; Brown et al, 2003; Ongaro, 2006). As Waluyo (2022) maintains, the focus is on qualitatively assessing “the actual practices conducted in day‐to‐day life, how ordinary actions are practiced in the agencies, and how practices and procedures are worked out in local agency settings.” Contributions aimed at understanding de facto as opposed to formal autonomy acknowledge the influence of path dependence in shaping agencification (Christensen & Lægreid, 2021; Maggetti & Verhoest, 2014).…”

Mapping of Local Government Internal Control System Problems: A Content Analysis

“…Government organizations including local governments are frequently criticized. Some of the criticisms include the low ability for creativity and innovation, lack of discipline, low quality of work and less productivity [1], large and inefficient [2], still considered wasteful [3], low capacity for human resources [4] and the level of corruption that still needs to be resolved [5]. Improvements are expected to emerge from the reform process.…”

“…Local governments in carrying out their activities follow the new public management (NPM) pattern. Experts see that NPM will be able to solve various problems in government organizations so that they carry out their operations like private organizations [2]. Christensen dan Laegreid Christensen and Laegreid [8] even states that NPM is also one of the concepts that focus on improving the response of public institutions to society, efficiency and accountability, and government performance.…”

Public Personnel Management Process Capability Assessment

“…In addition, public organizations have a multitude of extra organizational linkages and interdependency across organizational boundaries. As a result of this, existing process improvement approaches cannot be used as is and should be adapted to the public sector context (Brown, Waterhouse, & Flynn, 2003; Greasley, 2004; Gulledge & Sommer, 2002; Ongaro, 2004; Ongaro & Rouban, 2008; Roodhooft & Van den Abbeele, 2006).…”