1979
DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(79)90107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in the shape of the diffracting shock wave at a convex corner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CELM results show good agreement with the experimental data 48 . Figure 17 shows that after the shock wave is diffracted on a backward‐facing step, it is divided into a plane wave A and an arc‐shaped diffusion wave B.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CELM results show good agreement with the experimental data 48 . Figure 17 shows that after the shock wave is diffracted on a backward‐facing step, it is divided into a plane wave A and an arc‐shaped diffusion wave B.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The CELM results show good agreement with the experimental data. 48 Figure 17 shows that after the shock wave is diffracted on a backward-facing step, it is divided into a plane wave A and an arc-shaped diffusion wave B. A Prandtl-Meyer expansion flow C forms a backward shock wave E and a separation flow D at the backward-facing step because the Mach number after the shock remains greater than 1.…”
Section: Shock Wave Diffraction At a Backward-facing Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%