2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-00901-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in prefrontal activity and executive functions after action-based cognitive remediation in bipolar disorder: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 Indeed, this prediction is in line with the emerging demonstrations of treatment-related modulation of dlPFC activity in response to pharmacological treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) and vortioxetine, and the psychological intervention Action-Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR). 25,45,47,48 Future longitudinal studies assessing the predictive validity of dPFC target engagement for cognitive improvement are therefore warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Indeed, this prediction is in line with the emerging demonstrations of treatment-related modulation of dlPFC activity in response to pharmacological treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) and vortioxetine, and the psychological intervention Action-Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR). 25,45,47,48 Future longitudinal studies assessing the predictive validity of dPFC target engagement for cognitive improvement are therefore warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional MRI scan was relatively short based on current standards, and a longer multiband acquisition would improve the precision of signal estimation. For cluster-based analyses, we applied a threshold commonly used in clinical trials and studies with modest sample sizes, 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 although a more conservative threshold would further reduce the risk of type I error. We applied a hypothesis-driven, seed-to-whole-brain rsFC approach focused on the SN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group-level inferential models were conducted to compare the seed-based connectivity maps of participants with and without apathy. We implemented cluster-based inference using Gaussian random field theory with a height z score greater than 2.3 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 and a Bonferroni cluster correction of P < .0125 (2-tailed) to account for the number of seeds analyzed (n = 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, encoding-related paradigms may be less ideal than paradigms that tap into executive aspects of cognitive functions, such as N-back WM tests. We therefore recommend WM fMRI paradigms for future cognition trials to examine neurocircuitry target engagement, based on their robust sensitivity to (i) activity differences in dPFC and DMN between cognitively impaired and cognitively normal patients (Petersen et al, 2021), (ii) illnessassociated changes in dPFC activity (Macoveanu et al, 2020) and (iii) dPFC and DMN activity in response to pharmacological and psychological treatments targeting cognition (Miskowiak et al, 2016c;Ott et al, 2020a;Smith et al, 2018). In keeping with this, it is, however, important to note that drug-induced target engagement modulation of neurocircuitries does not always translate into demonstrable treatment-related cognitive improvement at a behavioural level in phase III clinical trials (Nathan and Bakker, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our recent fMRI study of 153 remitted BD patients with and without cognitive impairments, we found that patients who were cognitively impaired displayed hypo-activity in a dorsal CCN including dPFC and failure to switch off the default mode network (DMN) during N-back working memory (WM) (Petersen et al, 2021). We and others also found that distinct pharmacological and psychological treatments with beneficial effects on cognition, including erythropoietin (EPO), vortioxetine and action-based cognitive remediation, all modulated either verbal or spatial N-back WM-related dPFC activity in patients with mood disorders (Miskowiak et al, 2016c;Ott et al, 2020a;Smith et al, 2018). Importantly, we also detected change in dPFC activity during N-back WM performance after a mood episode in recently diagnosed BD patients, in the absence of performance decline on neuropsychological tests, suggesting that dPFC activity change is a more sensitive assay of change in brain function than overt cognitive performance (Macoveanu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%