1992
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Change in marital adjustment following marital therapy: A comparison of two outcome measures.

Abstract: Comparability of treatment outcome as measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and the Global Distress Scale (GDS) was examined for 49 couples who completed a behavioral marital therapy program. The GDS provided a more conservative estimate of treatment efficacy, as assessed by (a) computed effect sizes based on couple, husband, and wife scores and (b) clinical significance statistics based on couple and husband scores. This difference was hypothesized to be due in part to items on the GDS that assess his… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DAS is reliable and well-validated (Whisman & Jacobson, 1992). The 4 items on the DAS pertaining to sex within the relationship (categorized in the DAS as Affectional Expression) were removed from analyses of relationship satisfaction to ensure that the constructs of sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction were more independent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DAS is reliable and well-validated (Whisman & Jacobson, 1992). The 4 items on the DAS pertaining to sex within the relationship (categorized in the DAS as Affectional Expression) were removed from analyses of relationship satisfaction to ensure that the constructs of sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction were more independent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At five years, participants completed only the satisfaction subscale of the DAS, to reduce responder burden. The DAS is a 32-item measure of adjustment in spousal or committed relationships [31], arguably the gold standard and sensitive to change [55]. Response formats vary, using 5-, 6- and 7-point rating scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost 20 years ago, its author noted than it had been used in more than 1,000 studies by that point (Spanier, 1988), and its use has only continued to grow. For example, the DAS often serves as a dependent measure of marital satisfaction (e.g., in marital therapy outcome studies, Christensen, Atkins, Berns, Wheeler, Baucom, & Simpson, 2004; Whisman & Jacobson, 1992) or to classify “distressed” vs. “nondistressed” couples in marital interaction task research (e.g., Crane, Allgood, Larson, & Griffin, 1990; Eddy, Heyman, & Weiss, 1991). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%