Change in Content of Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase during Development and Senescence of Mulberry (<i>Moms alba</i>L.) Leaves

Yamashita, Tadaaki; Fujino, Akira

doi:10.1080/00380768.1987.10557589

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Determining the leaf nitrogen concentration that maximizes net carbon gain is of particular interest since a large proportion of leaf nitrogen is contained in photosynthetic enzymes (Kirk and TilneyBassett, 1978;Huffaker, 1982;Evans, 1983;Cowan, 1986;Field and Mooney, 1986;Evans and Terashima, 1987;Yamashita and Fujino, 1987). Consequently, leaf nitrogen correlates highly with photosynthetic capacity (Mooney, Ferrar and Slatyer, 1978;Gulmon and Chu, 1981;Evans, 1983;Field, Merino and Mooney, 1983;Field and Mooney, 1986).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of Carbon Dioxide and Daily Photon-flux Density on Optimal Leaf Nitrogen Concentration and Root: Shoot Ratio

1991

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a cost-benefit model, the leaf nitrogen concentration and root: shoot ratio that maximize whole-plant relative growth rate are determined as a function of the above-ground environment (integrated daily photon flux density and the concentration of carbon dioxide at the site of fixation within the leaf). The major advantage of this approach is that it determines the adaptive significance of leaf physiology by considering the functional integration of leaves and roots. The predicted response to increasing daily photon flux densities is an increase in optimal leaf N concentration (A^P,) and a concomitant increase in root:shoot ratio. Increased carbon dioxide concentrations, on the other hand, reduce N^ and only slightly change root: shoot ratio. The observed increase in leaf nitrogen concentration found in plants growing at high altitudes (low CO, partial pressure) is also predicted. Since these responses to light and CO, maximize the whole-plant relative growth rate, the observed adjustments that plants make to light and carbon dioxide concentration appear to be adaptive.We show that the relationship between photosynthesis and leaf nitrogen concentration is complex and depends on the light and CO, levels at which photosynthesis is measured. The shape of this function is important in determining N opl and the opposite response of leaf nitrogen to light and carbon dioxide is shown to be the result of the different effects of light and CO, on the photosynthesis-leaf nitrogen curve.

show abstract