2015
DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2015.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chang’s Conjecture, Generic Elementary Embeddings and Inner Models for Huge Cardinals

Abstract: We introduce a natural principle Strong Chang Reflection strengthening the classical Chang Conjectures. This principle is between a huge and a two huge cardinal in consistency strength. In this note we prove that it implies the existence of an inner model with a huge cardinal. The technique we explore for building inner models with huge cardinals adapts to show that decisive ideals imply the existence of inner models with supercompact cardinals. Proofs for all of these claims can be found in [10]. 1,2 Much of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foreman [95] highlighted the power of non-stationary ideals and their restrictions to selected stationary sets when he showed that the consistency of ZFC together with his strengthening of the classical Chang conjectures to the principle of Strong Chang Reflection 36 for (ω n+3 , ω n ) implies the consistency of ZFC together with the existence of a huge cardinal in a model of the form L[A * , Ȋ] where Ȋ is the dual of the appropriate nonstationary ideal. Foreman used the proposition below to show that the set A * was absolutely definable.…”
Section: Saturated Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreman [95] highlighted the power of non-stationary ideals and their restrictions to selected stationary sets when he showed that the consistency of ZFC together with his strengthening of the classical Chang conjectures to the principle of Strong Chang Reflection 36 for (ω n+3 , ω n ) implies the consistency of ZFC together with the existence of a huge cardinal in a model of the form L[A * , Ȋ] where Ȋ is the dual of the appropriate nonstationary ideal. Foreman used the proposition below to show that the set A * was absolutely definable.…”
Section: Saturated Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%