2023
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3245191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chang’E-4 Measurements of Lunar Surface Temperatures: Thermal Conductivity of the Near Surface Regolith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CE-4 temperature data used in this study were obtained from February 27 to March 28, 2019 , which corresponding to a diurnal cycle at local time of the Moon, with a temperature variation range of 116.05-367.20 K. Taking into account the terrain's shading effect on sunlight [25], the lunar surface temperature in the CE-4 landing area was calculated. The computed sunrise and sunset times aligned with the measured temperature data, indicating that the measured data accurately reflects the temperature of the external surface of the installation site [28], [29]. The temperature data can be utilized to study the effect of the thermal environment on the surface temperature of the lander.…”
Section: B In-situ Measurement Of Physical Temperaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…The CE-4 temperature data used in this study were obtained from February 27 to March 28, 2019 , which corresponding to a diurnal cycle at local time of the Moon, with a temperature variation range of 116.05-367.20 K. Taking into account the terrain's shading effect on sunlight [25], the lunar surface temperature in the CE-4 landing area was calculated. The computed sunrise and sunset times aligned with the measured temperature data, indicating that the measured data accurately reflects the temperature of the external surface of the installation site [28], [29]. The temperature data can be utilized to study the effect of the thermal environment on the surface temperature of the lander.…”
Section: B In-situ Measurement Of Physical Temperaturementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Since 2007, nearly two dozen lunar orbiter and lander missions from a wide range of nations have brought renewed interest to the nature and diversity of the lunar surface (Crawford et al., 2012), with additional missions from China—Chang'e‐1 (Gong & Jin, 2012; Zheng et al., 2012), Chang'e‐2 (Fang & Fa, 2014; Zheng et al., 2019), Chang'e‐3 (Ding et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022), Chang'e‐4 (Feng et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2023), Chang'e‐5 (Che et al., 2021; Haupt et al., 2023; Zong et al., 2022)—the United States—Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (Paige et al., 2010; Tooley et al., 2010; Vondrak et al., 2010; Williams et al., 2017), LCROSS (Jordan et al., 2013; Luchsinger et al., 2021), GRAIL (Zheng et al., 2022; Zuber et al., 2013), LADEE (Cohen et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2021)—Japan—Hakuto—and Korea—KPLO/Danuri—over the last few decades. These missions signal a heightened awareness of the need to understand the nature of the lunar surface beyond the regions sampled by Apollo (Cremers, 1971, 1975; Fujii & Osako, 1973; Horai et al., 1970, 1980; Morrison & Norton, 1970; Robie et al., 1970) and the Russian Luna robotic return missions (Bansal et al., 1972; Haggerty, 1977; Ivanov et al., 1973; Ma et al., 1979; Okabayashi et al., 2020) not only to understand both the geological diversity (Zhang et al., 2023) and history of the Moon (Che et al., 2021; Qian et al., 2021) but also to prepare the future exploration and exploitation of the materials (Ambrose, 2013; Badescu, 2012; Blutstein, 2021; Duke et al., 2006; McLeod & Krekeler, 2017; Sowers & Dreyer, 2019; Wager et al., 2022) on the lunar surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%