2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05957.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chandra imaging spectroscopy of 1E 1740.7-2942

Abstract: In 2000 August, we observed the black hole candidate 1E 1740.7−2942, the brightest persistent hard X‐ray source within a few degrees of the Galactic Centre, for 10 ks with Chandra (ACIS‐I). Attempting to compensate for pile‐up effects, we found that the spectra were well‐fitted by an absorbed power law, with photon indices Γ= 1.54+0.42−0.37 (readout streak) and Γ= 1.42+0.14−0.14 (annulus), consistent with a black hole low/hard state. We have analysed a public observation performed by Chandra which utilized sho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
25
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(37 reference statements)
8
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations with ASCA (Sakano et al 1999) found an average value of 9.7 ± 0.4 in eight observations. A Chandra/HETGS study found 11.8±0.6 (Cui et al 2001), whereas a Chandra/ACIS-I found 10.5 ± 0.6 (Gallo & Fender 2002). The average in our three observations is 13.6 ± 0.1.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Observations with ASCA (Sakano et al 1999) found an average value of 9.7 ± 0.4 in eight observations. A Chandra/HETGS study found 11.8±0.6 (Cui et al 2001), whereas a Chandra/ACIS-I found 10.5 ± 0.6 (Gallo & Fender 2002). The average in our three observations is 13.6 ± 0.1.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The lower energy threshold is due to the low count rate and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) below ∼2 keV for both cameras (PN and MOS1) according to the pileup analysis. We also note that ∼2 keV was the lower limit in energy used by ASCA (Sakano et al 1999) and Chandra on two occasions (Cui et al 2001;Gallo & Fender 2002). With our spectra also starting around 2 keV we left the hydrogen column density as a free parameter in our fits.…”
Section: Data Selection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high hydrogen column density toward the source, recently estimated by Chandra as N H 1.05 × 10 23 cm −2 (Gallo & Fender 2002), does not permit any identification of its optical counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%