Chance of Misclassification in the Case of Several Normal Populations

Paek, Pil S.; Kshirsagar, A. M.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.1996.tb00365.x

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Further Reading Huberty (1984) mentions some indices that may be considered as alternatives to I in (16.7); a reference dealing with a statistical test for the I index is also given. Park and Kshirsagar (1996) discuss "chance" classification in a (mathematical) context different from our context. Press (1972 p. 773) presents a χ 2 (1) statistic for testing the hypothesis of chance classification; this statistic is a special case of the square of (16.4) when a chance proportion of correct classifications is 1/J .…”

Section: Technical Notesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Answers to Exercises

2005

Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

List of Figures1.1 Classification of multivariate methods. 2.1 Distance in a plane. 5.1 LDF plot of group centroids for Baumann study. 5.2 Plot of group centroids in LDF space. 6.1 Plot of Wilks values versus best subset size for the 3-group Ethington data. 7.1 LDF plot of group centroids. 7.2 MANOVA and descriptive discriminant analysis.8.1 LDF plot for the three school levels. 9.1 Two dimensional plot of adjusted group centroids. 12.1 Distance in a plane. 12.2 Graphical representations of two density functions. 17.1 Total group L-O-O hit rate versus best-subset size for the 3-group Ethington data. 20.1 Predictive discriminant analysis. xix M. S. Poudevigne (Clayton State University).There are several students who attended The University of Georgia and gave us considerable assistance in preparing this second edition. Jason Lemley was very patient and persistent in helping to process some of the text. Veena Dhankher and In-Suk Kim were very helpful in providing computer assistance for several data sets used in this book. And special thanks to the students in the 2005 Fall section of the multivariate class, particularly Hye-Jeong Choi and Chen-Yao Koa, who persistently requested further clarification of the text and identified omissions and mistypes in an earlier draft of this book.We would also like to thank our University of Georgia Colleague, Seock-Ho Kim, for his assistance in the use of the LaTex text formating software.The patience and efforts of Wiley editors, including Christine Punzo, Susanne Steitz, and Stephen Quigley, are greatly appreciated.xxvii Rank of score on X 19.2.1

show abstract

Section: Technical Notesmentioning

confidence: 98%