2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chance-constrained multi-objective optimization of groundwater remediation design at DNAPLs-contaminated sites using a multi-algorithm genetically adaptive method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM parameters greatly impact the prediction ability of the SVM model, therefore, reasonable selection of parameters is important to establish an SVM model. GA is an effective method to select parameters with characteristics of global optimization and computational stability (Lin et al 2013;Lewis and Randall 2017;Ouyang et al 2017). Therefore, GA is used to select SVM parameters, avoiding the subjectivity of artificially selecting parameters and improving the prediction ability of SVM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM parameters greatly impact the prediction ability of the SVM model, therefore, reasonable selection of parameters is important to establish an SVM model. GA is an effective method to select parameters with characteristics of global optimization and computational stability (Lin et al 2013;Lewis and Randall 2017;Ouyang et al 2017). Therefore, GA is used to select SVM parameters, avoiding the subjectivity of artificially selecting parameters and improving the prediction ability of SVM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem can thus be formulated as determining the location and number of wells as well as the required pumping rates at these wells such that the cost is minimum and the desired quality levels are maintained. Several studies used EAs for solving the groundwater remediation problems via the simulation-optimization framework such as GA (Huang & Mayer 1997;Wang & Zheng 1997;Sun & Zheng 1999;Smalley et al 2000;Yoon & Shoemaker 2001;Zheng & Wang 2002;Babbar & Minsker 2006;Wu et al 2006;Park et al 2007;Bayer et al 2008;Seyedpour et al 2019), SA (Kobayashi et al 2008); MOGA (Erickson et al 2002;Mantoglou & Kourakos 2007;Singh et al 2008), NSGA-II (Singh & Chakrabarty 2011;Ouyang et al 2017), etc. More details of these EAs applications are also elaborated in Table 9.…”
Section: Applications In Reservoir Operation and Irrigation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some processes can be solved by physical and numerical models, but still retain some unresolved hypotheses or a trial and error program. Thus, the MOGA is an appropriate method for solving multi-objective nonlinear optimization problems (Lin et al 2013;Lewis and Randall 2017;Ouyang et al 2017). An integrating model combining the MOGA and SVM is developed herein to forecast groundwater level and identify the optimal input combinations.…”
Section: Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (Moga)mentioning
confidence: 99%