2019
DOI: 10.1089/apc.2019.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHAMP+ Thailand: Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Family-Based Psychosocial Intervention for Perinatally HIV-Infected Early Adolescents

Abstract: Within Asia, HIV prevalence is highest in Thailand, including thousands of children and adolescents. Care for children born with HIV [perinatal transmission of HIV (PHIV)] will need to focus on adolescents for the foreseeable future. Thai PHIV adolescents experience significant mental health and psychosocial challenges, including treatment adherence. Yet, few, if any, comprehensive interventions for them exist. CHAMP+, an evidence-based intervention adapted for Thailand, was evaluated with a pilot randomized c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve studies used a randomised control trial (RCT) design. 9,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Five of these were cluster RCTs, clustered by village, 34 township, 32 school 33,36 and church. 35 One study used a quasi-experimental post-intervention design.…”
Section: Study Design Of Included Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Twelve studies used a randomised control trial (RCT) design. 9,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Five of these were cluster RCTs, clustered by village, 34 township, 32 school 33,36 and church. 35 One study used a quasi-experimental post-intervention design.…”
Section: Study Design Of Included Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Two studies used a pre-post design, without control groups. [38][39][40] Nine studies employed a single follow-up period of either 3 or 6 months; 9,26,28,29,32,33,[37][38][39] six studies variously used two follow-up periods that ranged from 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months, 27,30,[34][35][36]40 and one study used three follow-up periods of 6, 12 and 18 months. 31 The median follow-up period was 3 months.…”
Section: Study Design Of Included Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations