Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chameleon: Bringing Interactivity to Static Digital Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, A.S. extracted and P.Z. cross-checked data from the Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves from the included reports using ChartDetective [ 53 ]. All disagreements were resolved after data extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, A.S. extracted and P.Z. cross-checked data from the Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves from the included reports using ChartDetective [ 53 ]. All disagreements were resolved after data extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScolarPhi [19] augments scientific papers with overlays that provide definitions and context for technical terms and symbols. The technical challenge of creating more interactive documents has also been addressed by libraries such as Tangle 8 , specialised tag languages such as Idyll [8], and computer vision-based systems such as Chameleon [34].…”
Section: Augmented Documentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also limited our investigation to the case of static figures, which remains the main visual medium to describe interactive scenarios in research papers. As such, we deliberately decided to ignore dynamic [32,43,44] and interactive figures [62] even though some can be found in recent HCI appears [29,32], because they are not natively supported by most formats used for communicating about interactive scenarios (typically PDF research papers), and even when used, they require an equivalent static figure [32,62].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%