2011
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccq091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenging the traditional/communicative dichotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, responses obtained from the questions let the students to engage in class discussion more actively, speak up their ideas, and learn from each other. which can lead to deep learning (Beaumont & Chang, 2011;Fry, Ketteridge, & Marshall, 2003;Walsh, 2011;Xuerong, 2012). However, bear in mind that even though students' participation in lecture process is highly reinforced, the lecturer's control toward the flow of the class is still needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, responses obtained from the questions let the students to engage in class discussion more actively, speak up their ideas, and learn from each other. which can lead to deep learning (Beaumont & Chang, 2011;Fry, Ketteridge, & Marshall, 2003;Walsh, 2011;Xuerong, 2012). However, bear in mind that even though students' participation in lecture process is highly reinforced, the lecturer's control toward the flow of the class is still needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richards and Rodgers (2001: 155) therefore conclude that "[T]here is no single text or authority on it, nor any single model that is universally accepted as authoritative". This ambiguity gives rise to the situations in which different people focus on different characteristics of CLT and there is a discrepancy between the principles accepted by teachers and their actual classroom practice (Sakui, 2004;Beaumont & Chang, 2011).…”
Section: ) Issue Of Indefinabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Bax (2003: 278) criticises the "CLT attitude" adopted by many language teachers, warning that "the consequences of this are serious, to the extent that we need to demote CLT as our main paradigm…". Aware of this danger, some scholars have researched CLT in specific contexts, such as in China (Hu, 2002(Hu, , 2005, Japan (Sakui, 2004), South Korea (Beaumont & Chang, 2011) or East Asia as a whole (Littlewood, 2007). Those studies further attest to the view that CLT means "a multitude of different things to different people" (Harmer, 2003: 289).…”
Section: ) Context-free Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, EFL teaching should be eclectic and localized for CLT to yield the greatest benefits to EFL countries. Beaumont and Chang (2011) once challenged the dichotomy between the traditional and communicative approaches, arguing that what is the most helpful for teachers is to "define more precisely what it is they are doing in the classroom, how that might be justified in terms of language learning outcomes, …" (p. 299). Further research needs to be conducted to explore a workable blend of both CLT and traditional teaching methods in EFL contexts.…”
Section: A Call For the Communicative Language Teaching Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%