2019
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p08-061-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenging in Rats the Use of 13C Spirulina as Reference Protein for the Dual Isotope Method to Determine Amino Acid Bioavailability (P08-061-19)

Abstract: Objectives In order to establish DIAAS in humans, the FAO recommended to develop a new method to measure indispensable amino acid (IAA) digestibility. This method uses two isotopic labeling, one for the protein to test and one for a reference protein. Spirulina was chosen as the 13C reference protein due to its commercial availability and affordability. However, the real digestibility of spirulina protein has not been measured in vivo. This work aims to assess the digestibility of spirulina a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean true ileal IAA digestibility of goat milk protein (94.0%) was similar to that of cow milk protein isolate and skimmed milk protein (95.1% and 95.5%) in healthy French adults ( 8 , 28 ). It also compared reasonably well (94.0% compared with 97.2%) with the true ileal digestibility of goat milk protein concentrate in rats ( 29 ). The individual IAA digestibility was within the range (93–100%) of previously reported values ( 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The mean true ileal IAA digestibility of goat milk protein (94.0%) was similar to that of cow milk protein isolate and skimmed milk protein (95.1% and 95.5%) in healthy French adults ( 8 , 28 ). It also compared reasonably well (94.0% compared with 97.2%) with the true ileal digestibility of goat milk protein concentrate in rats ( 29 ). The individual IAA digestibility was within the range (93–100%) of previously reported values ( 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%