Objective
In order to address the social determinants of health, an increasing
number of public health practitioners are implementing Health in All
Policies initiatives aimed at increasing cross-sector collaboration and
integrating health considerations into decisions made by
“non-health” sectors. Despite the growth in practice
nationally and internationally, evaluation of Health in All Policies is a
relatively new field. In order to help inform evaluation of Health in All
Policies initiatives in the United States, this study sought to develop a
practice-grounded approach, including a logic model and a set of potential
indicators, which could be used to describe and assess Health in All
Policies activities, outputs, and outcomes.
Design
Methods included: a) a review of the literature on current Health in
All Policies approaches, practices, and evaluations; and b) consultation
with experts with substantive knowledge in implementing or evaluating Health
in All Policies initiatives. Feedback from experts was obtained through
individual (n=11) and group (n=14) consultation.
Results
The logic model depicts a range of potential inputs, activities,
outputs, and outcomes of Health in All Policies initiatives; example
indicators for each component of the logic model are provided. Case studies
from California, Washington, and Nashville highlight emerging examples of
Health in All Policies evaluation and the ways in which local context and
goals inform evaluation efforts.
Conclusions
The tools presented in this article synthesize concepts present in
the emerging literature on Health in All Policies implementation and
evaluation. Practitioners and researchers can the tools to facilitate
dialogue among stakeholders, clarify assumptions, identify how they will
assess progress, and implement data-driven ways to improve their Health in
All Policies work.