Challenging Anti-gypsyism in Academia

Abstract

KeywordsAs a social phenomenon and an ideology, anti-gypsyism is sustained on essentialized narratives, which reify ethnic borders (between those considered as Roma and non-Roma) and assumes internal homogeneity of all members of the Romani group based on vaguely-defined and generalized notions of "culture" or "ethnicity". These narratives tend to exclude plural and diverse representation of social realities and intersecting Romani identities, which can challenge the dominant and stigmatizing discourse. In this paper, I analyse how academic discourse contributes to sustaining essentialist representations of Roma and assess how more nuanced, plural, and context-sensitive interpretations of ethnic identity can contribute to challenging anti-gypsyism. By reviewing the scholarship of Brubaker (2002( ), Hall (1996 and Vertovec (2007), I discuss the potential of definitions in deconstructing homogenized and essentialized discourses on Roma in knowledge production and beyond. Furthermore, I discuss how the emergence and dynamic development of Romani scholarship has been gradually challenging the legacy of Romani Studies and providing an entry into new avenues of research, conducted primarily from the standpoint of Romani scholars. I argue that their engagement in knowledgeproduction is essential for promoting diversified, balanced and context-sensitive discourses. In this article, rather than prescribing a specific, normative framework for Romani Studies and elaborating a fixed research agenda, I point to possible directions and promising theoretical avenues which may provide a refreshing counter-balance to an otherwise homogenizing scholarship. In doing so, I assess possible implications for adapting diverse notions of ethnicity as a tool for de-essentializing academic discourses on Roma -including advantages and existing risks. Such an approach enables the mapping out of issues and challenges relevant for the process of elaborating a Critical Romani Studies research agenda. AbstractCritical Romani Studies 10

An insider looking in or an outsider wannabee? Studying vulnerable hard-to-reach populations in the field of victimology – the example of the Roma communities in Sweden

“…Even though I think that such stories may affect all researchers of marginalized populations, I think it is likely that insiders are often more negatively affected than outsider researchers, and I would advise insiders to take precautions. In addition, among scholars interested in Roma communities (Beebeejaun et al, 2014;Mirga-Kruszelnicka, 2018), it has been argued that an insider-researcher's engagement in knowledge production is essential for promoting diversified, balanced and context-sensitive discourses. I certainly agree that diversity is important within academia, especially among such populations that are understudied.…”

Placing Django: Narratives of heritage and race in a Parisian exhibition

“…17 Including Manouche perspectives more meaningfully and earlier on might have changed the shape of the exhibition. It would have also provided some corrective to the long history of non-Romani control over public representations of Romanies (Mirga-Kruszelnicka, 2018;Saul and Tebbutt, 2004). This lack of consultation, combined with the exhibition's exoticization of Romanies, recalls how numerous European museums have represented colonised peoples in part to justify imperialist projects (Thomas, 2009).…”

Why Do Roma Migrate? A Critical Analysis of Academic Silence in Polish Scholarship

“…In academia, silence historically concerned the lack of Romani voices or an inability to listen to those we talk or write about. Roma still lack, for example, a full recognition of their history in mainstream European historical discourse as well as in researchers of Roma origin (Bartosz 1994;Mirga and Mróz 1994;Acton 1997;Mirga-Kruszelnicka 2018). The ongoing paradigm shift in Romani studies (Ryder 2018, 92) means that we are seeing an increase in "insider" accounts, challenging -though not without controversy -the hegemony of non-Romani scholars (Corradi 2017).…”